Literature DB >> 15683528

Automatic identification of clinical lead dysfunctions.

Bruce D Gunderson1, Amisha S Patel, Chad A Bounds, Kenneth A Ellenbogen.   

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) lead dysfunctions can cause inappropriate shocks. Current ICDs store lead diagnostics and detected episodes. This stored information with intracardiac electrograms (EGM) and sensed RR interval patterns may characterize the ICD lead performance. The aim of this analysis was to determine the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of an automatic lead dysfunction identification algorithm. This algorithm uses RR and EGM data to distinguish noncardiac oversensing (OS), for example, due to conductor fracture, and cardiac OS, for example, T-wave OS, from detected episodes. The algorithm also uses lead diagnostics: sensing integrity counter trends (e.g., RR intervals <140 ms), nonsustained tachyarrhythmias episodes with a mean RR <200 ms and impedance trends to identify lead fractures. The PPV was determined using the stored memory from 1,756 ICD patients enrolled in a 13-center long-term lead study with an average follow-up of 18.3 patient-months. Sensitivity was determined in 35 patients who presented with OS or lead fracture-related adverse events confirmed by stored ICD diagnostics. The algorithm sensitivity was 97.1% (34/35). There were 43 additional patients identified by the algorithm without an adverse event. Stored ICD diagnostics confirmed lead dysfunctions in 32 of 43 patients corresponding with an 85.7% PPV (66/77). ICD memory diagnostics and episodes with intracardiac EGM may be used to identify ICD lead dysfunctions with high sensitivity and PPV. This algorithm may be implemented in postprocessing ICD environments (e.g., remote server, programmer) to rapidly identify lead dysfunction prior its clinical manifestation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15683528     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00065.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

1.  Can we predict and prevent adverse events related to high-voltage implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead failure?

Authors:  Renato Pietro Ricci; Carlo Pignalberi; Barbara Magris; Stefano Aquilani; Vito Altamura; Loredana Morichelli; Antonio Porfili; Laura Quarta; Fabio Saputo; Massimo Santini
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Unexpected inhibition of bradycardia pacing due to oversensing in ICD lead fracture associated with spurious tachyarrhythmia detection and discharges.

Authors:  Fani Zagkli; Panagiotis Chronopoulos; John Chiladakis
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-03-02

3.  Implantable defibrillator lead extraction with optimized standard extraction techniques.

Authors:  Xian-Ming Chu; Xue-Bin Li; Ping Zhang; Yi An; Jiang-Bo Duan; Long Wang; Ding Li; Bing Li; Ji-Hong Guo
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.