AIM: To investigate the difference in activation of STAT3 signaling between two human stomach adenocarcinoma cell lines: 5-fluorouracil resistant cell line and its parental cell line, and to evaluate its relationship with the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). METHODS: Western blot and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) were used to detect the expression of phospho-STAT3 protein and constitutive activation of STAT3 in two human stomach adenocarcinoma cell lines, 5-fluorouracil resistant cell line SGC7901/R and its parental cell line SGC7901, respectively. The mRNA expression of VEGF was analysed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The expressive intensity of VEGF protein was measured by immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: The expressions of phospho-STAT3 protein and constitutive activation of STAT3 between two human stomach adenocarcinoma cell lines were different. Compared with the parental cell line SGC7901, the STAT3-DNA binding activity and the expressive intensity of phospho-STAT3 protein were lower in the drug-resistant cell line SGC7901/R. The expression levels of VEGF mRNA and its encoded protein were also decreased in drug-resistant cell line. CONCLUSION: Over-expression of VEGF may be correlated with elevated STAT3 activation in parental cell line. Lower VEGF expression may be correlated with decreased STAT3 activation in resistant cell line, which may have resulted from negative feedback regulation of STAT signaling.
AIM: To investigate the difference in activation of STAT3 signaling between two humanstomach adenocarcinoma cell lines: 5-fluorouracil resistant cell line and its parental cell line, and to evaluate its relationship with the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). METHODS: Western blot and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) were used to detect the expression of phospho-STAT3 protein and constitutive activation of STAT3 in two humanstomach adenocarcinoma cell lines, 5-fluorouracil resistant cell line SGC7901/R and its parental cell line SGC7901, respectively. The mRNA expression of VEGF was analysed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. The expressive intensity of VEGF protein was measured by immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: The expressions of phospho-STAT3 protein and constitutive activation of STAT3 between two humanstomach adenocarcinoma cell lines were different. Compared with the parental cell line SGC7901, the STAT3-DNA binding activity and the expressive intensity of phospho-STAT3 protein were lower in the drug-resistant cell line SGC7901/R. The expression levels of VEGF mRNA and its encoded protein were also decreased in drug-resistant cell line. CONCLUSION: Over-expression of VEGF may be correlated with elevated STAT3 activation in parental cell line. Lower VEGF expression may be correlated with decreased STAT3 activation in resistant cell line, which may have resulted from negative feedback regulation of STAT signaling.
Authors: J C Marine; C McKay; D Wang; D J Topham; E Parganas; H Nakajima; H Pendeville; H Yasukawa; A Sasaki; A Yoshimura; J N Ihle Journal: Cell Date: 1999-09-03 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Guilian Niu; Kenneth L Wright; Mei Huang; Lanxi Song; Eric Haura; James Turkson; Shumin Zhang; Tianhong Wang; Dominic Sinibaldi; Domenico Coppola; Richard Heller; Lee M Ellis; James Karras; Jacqueline Bromberg; Drew Pardoll; Richard Jove; Hua Yu Journal: Oncogene Date: 2002-03-27 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: J R Grandis; S D Drenning; Q Zeng; S C Watkins; M F Melhem; S Endo; D E Johnson; L Huang; Y He; J D Kim Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-04-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: R Catlett-Falcone; T H Landowski; M M Oshiro; J Turkson; A Levitzki; R Savino; G Ciliberto; L Moscinski; J L Fernández-Luna; G Nuñez; W S Dalton; R Jove Journal: Immunity Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Daoyan Wei; Xiangdong Le; Leizhen Zheng; Liwei Wang; Jennifer A Frey; Allen C Gao; Zhihai Peng; Suyun Huang; Henry Q Xiong; James L Abbruzzese; Keping Xie Journal: Oncogene Date: 2003-01-23 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Wei Guang; Steven J Czinn; Thomas G Blanchard; K Chul Kim; Erik P Lillehoj Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 3.575