Literature DB >> 15682301

Cocaine and heroin ('speedball') self-administration: the involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine and mu-opiate, but not delta-opiate receptors.

Jennifer L Cornish1, Jaclyn M Lontos, Kelly J Clemens, Iain S McGregor.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The combined administration of heroin and cocaine ('speedball') is common among intravenous drug users. Dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens play a key role in cocaine self-administration; however, their role in speedball self-administration is unknown, as is the role of opiate receptors in this region.
OBJECTIVES: The effect of blocking dopamine D1, D2, mu-opiate or delta-opiate receptors in the nucleus accumbens on the intravenous self-administration of combined heroin and cocaine was examined in rats.
METHODS: Rats with bilateral cannulae implanted into the nucleus accumbens were trained to self-administer intravenous speedball (ratio of cocaine/heroin, 17:1) under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule. Prior to their self-administration session, rats were then microinjected with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (1 and 6 nmol side(-1)), the D2 receptor antagonist raclopride (3 and 10 nmol side(-1)), the mu-opiate receptor antagonist CTOP (0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 nmol side(-1)), the delta-opiate receptor antagonist naltrindole (1.0, 3.0 and 10 nmol side(-1)) or a cocktail of SCH 23390 (1 nmol side(-1)) and CTOP (0.1 nmol side(-1)) into the nucleus accumbens.
RESULTS: Microinjection of SCH 23390, raclopride or CTOP into the nucleus accumbens produced dose-dependent decreases in breakpoints under the PR schedule, while naltrindole was without effect. The highest dose of SCH 23390 also significantly reduced locomotor activity measured during speedball self-administration. The combination of SCH 23390 and CTOP significantly reduced breakpoints, while not affecting locomotor activity.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that dopamine and mu-opiate receptors, but not delta-opiate receptors, in the nucleus accumbens are involved in the reinforcing effects of speedball. Combined administration of D1 and mu-opiate receptor antagonists may be more selective at reducing the reinforcing effects of speedball self-administration than either drug alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15682301     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-2135-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  61 in total

1.  Effects of flupenthixol and quadazocine on self-administration of speedball combinations of cocaine and heroin by rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  N K Mello; S S Negus
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Biphasic dose-related effects of morphine on dopamine release.

Authors:  I M Maisonneuve; L M Warner; S D Glick
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Brain reward circuitry: insights from unsensed incentives.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Synergistic elevations in nucleus accumbens extracellular dopamine concentrations during self-administration of cocaine/heroin combinations (Speedball) in rats.

Authors:  S E Hemby; C Co; S I Dworkin; J E Smith
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  The effects of eticlopride and naltrexone on responding maintained by food, cocaine, heroin and cocaine/heroin combinations in rats.

Authors:  S E Hemby; J E Smith; S I Dworkin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Reinforcing effects of brain microinjections of morphine revealed by conditioned place preference.

Authors:  D van der Kooy; R F Mucha; M O'Shaughnessy; P Bucenieks
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-08       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Elevations of nucleus accumbens dopamine and DOPAC levels during intravenous heroin self-administration.

Authors:  R A Wise; P Leone; R Rivest; K Leeb
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  Opiate antagonists reduce cocaine but not nicotine self-administration.

Authors:  W A Corrigall; K M Coen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Self-administration of cocaine-heroin combinations by rhesus monkeys: antagonism by naltrexone.

Authors:  J K Rowlett; K M Wilcox; W L Woolverton
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  The synergistic effects of combining cocaine and heroin ("speedball") using a progressive-ratio schedule of drug reinforcement.

Authors:  C L Duvauchelle; T Sapoznik; C Kornetsky
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  10 in total

1.  Upregulation of nerve growth factor in central amygdala increases sensitivity to opioid reward.

Authors:  Bihua Bie; Yan Wang; You-Qing Cai; Zhi Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Hou; Zhizhong Z Pan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Self-administered heroin and cocaine combinations in the rat: additive reinforcing effects-supra-additive effects on nucleus accumbens extracellular dopamine.

Authors:  James E Smith; Conchita Co; Michael D Coller; Scott E Hemby; Thomas J Martin
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Sustained release d-amphetamine reduces cocaine but not 'speedball'-seeking in buprenorphine-maintained volunteers: a test of dual-agonist pharmacotherapy for cocaine/heroin polydrug abusers.

Authors:  Mark K Greenwald; Leslie H Lundahl; Caren L Steinmiller
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Powerful behavioral interactions between methamphetamine and morphine.

Authors:  Keith A Trujillo; Monique L Smith; Melissa M Guaderrama
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Dopamine D1 receptor antagonist reduces stimulant-induced conditioned place preferences and dopamine receptor supersensitivity.

Authors:  Sun Mi Gu; Hye Jin Cha; So Woon Seo; Jin Tae Hong; Jaesuk Yun
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Reward processing by the opioid system in the brain.

Authors:  Julie Le Merrer; Jérôme A J Becker; Katia Befort; Brigitte L Kieffer
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Ethanol-induced delta-opioid receptor modulation of glutamate synaptic transmission and conditioned place preference in central amygdala.

Authors:  B Bie; W Zhu; Z Z Pan
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Naloxone induces frequent jumping after chronic morphine and methamphetamine co-administration in rats.

Authors:  Gholamreza Kaka; Ramin Rahmanzade; Farzin Safee; Abbas Haghparast
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014

9.  Agonist-induced phosphorylation bar code and differential post-activation signaling of the delta opioid receptor revealed by phosphosite-specific antibodies.

Authors:  Anika Mann; Sophia Liebetrau; Marie Klima; Pooja Dasgupta; Dominique Massotte; Stefan Schulz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Goofballing of Opioid and Methamphetamine: The Science Behind the Deadly Cocktail.

Authors:  Hanis Mohammad Hazani; Isa Naina Mohamed; Mustapha Muzaimi; Wael Mohamed; Mohamad Fairuz Yahaya; Seong Lin Teoh; Rashidi Mohamed Pakri Mohamed; Mohd Fadzli Mohamad Isa; Sundus Mansoor Abdulrahman; Ravi Ramadah; Mohammad Rahim Kamaluddin; Jaya Kumar
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.988

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.