Literature DB >> 15682250

Participation in health impact assessment: objectives, methods and core values.

John Wright1, Jayne Parry, Jonathan Mathers.   

Abstract

Health impact assessment (HIA) is a multidisciplinary aid to decision-making that assesses the impact of policy on public health and on health inequalities. Its purpose is to assist decision-makers to maximize health gains and to reduce inequalities. The 1999 Gothenburg Consensus Paper (GCP) provides researchers with a rationale for establishing community participation as a core value of HIA. According to the GCP, participation in HIA empowers people within the decision-making process and redresses the democratic deficit between government and society. Participation in HIA generates a sense that health and decision-making is community-owned, and the personal experiences of citizens become integral to the formulation of policy. However, the participatory and empowering dimensions of HIA may prove difficult to operationalize. In this review of the participation strategies adopted in key applications of HIA in the United Kingdom, we found that HIA's aim of influencing decision-making creates tension between its participatory and knowledge-gathering dimensions. Accordingly, researchers have decreased the participatory dimension of HIA by reducing the importance attached to the community's experience of empowerment, ownership and democracy, while enlarging its knowledge-gathering dimension by giving pre-eminence to "expert" and "research-generated" evidence. Recent applications of HIA offer a serviceable rationale for participation as a means of information gathering and it is no longer tenable to uphold HIA as a means of empowering communities and advancing the aims of participatory democracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15682250      PMCID: PMC2623465          DOI: /S0042-96862005000100015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  7 in total

1.  Growing the field of health impact assessment in the United States: an agenda for research and practice.

Authors:  Andrew L Dannenberg; Rajiv Bhatia; Brian L Cole; Carlos Dora; Jonathan E Fielding; Katherine Kraft; Diane McClymont-Peace; Jennifer Mindell; Chinwe Onyekere; James A Roberts; Catherine L Ross; Candace D Rutt; Alex Scott-Samuel; Hugh H Tilson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model.

Authors:  Hester M van de Bovenkamp; Margo J Trappenburg; Kor J Grit
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Health data from diaries used in low-income communities, north India.

Authors:  Neeta Kumar; Tulsi Adhikari; Jiten Kh Singh; Nidhi Tiwari; Anita S Acharya
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 4.  Moving from intersection to integration: public health law research and public health systems and services research.

Authors:  Scott Burris; Glen P Mays; F Douglas Scutchfield; Jennifer K Ibrahim
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Citizen Science for public health.

Authors:  Lea Den Broeder; Jeroen Devilee; Hans Van Oers; A Jantine Schuit; Annemarie Wagemakers
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.483

6.  Integrated approaches to address the social determinants of health for reducing health inequity.

Authors:  Françoise Barten; Diana Mitlin; Catherine Mulholland; Ana Hardoy; Ruth Stern
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 7.  Inclusion of Health in Impact Assessment: A Review of Current Practice in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Dominik Dietler; Ruth Lewinski; Sophie Azevedo; Rebecca Engebretsen; Fritz Brugger; Jürg Utzinger; Mirko S Winkler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.