Literature DB >> 15681007

Hydrophilicity of elastomeric non-aqueous impression materials during setting.

Frank Rupp1, Detlef Axmann, Anne Jacobi, Martin Groten, Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Clinically relevant accuracy of dental impressions depends on flowing and wetting properties of the applied impression materials. The major objective of this study was to develop an experimental set-up and an analysis strategy for wettability measurements of impression materials during their working time.
METHODS: High-resolution drop shape analysis was used to study contact angles on thin unset films of two polyether and two vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression materials. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the contact angle evolution in terms of initial values and the equilibrium state of hydrophilicity, as well as in terms of kinetics of hydrophilization were extended using a mathematical model approach.
RESULTS: Compared to VPS impression materials, polyethers show pronounced and constant initial hydrophilicity throughout prescribed working time. The kinetics of the VPS impression materials towards more hydrophilic equilibrium surface states is very fast compared to polyethers. This possibly balances the disadvantage of the initial VPS impression materials hydrophobicity. Generally, the experimental and analytical methods have proven to yield detailed insights into the wetting characteristics during setting. SIGNIFICANCE: Both, high initial and a fast kinetics towards increased hydrophilicity may improve flowing and wetting processes during impression taking. Therefore, time-resolved wettability studies should be regarded when developing advanced impression materials and defining working times. They may supplement rheological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15681007     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  7 in total

1.  Digital assessment of properties of the three different generations of dental elastomeric impression materials.

Authors:  Lamia Singer; Shaymaa I Habib; Heba El-Amin Shalaby; Sayed H Saniour; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Thiol-ene functionalized siloxanes for use as elastomeric dental impression materials.

Authors:  Megan A Cole; Katherine C Jankousky; Christopher N Bowman
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Evaluation of the accuracy, precision and validity of hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression material for bite mark analysis.

Authors:  Sujatha S Reddy; N Rakesh; Atul Kaushik; D Devaraju; B S Nanda Kumar
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.068

4.  Evaluation of Elastomeric Impression Materials' Hydrophilicity: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Anna Theocharidou; Konstantinos Tzimas; Kosmas Tolidis; Dimitrios Tortopidis
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2021-09

5.  Comparative Evaluation of Wettability at Various Stages of Working Time for Light Body and Medium Body Consistencies of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials.

Authors:  Ashwini Obla Rameshbabu; Divagar Chandrasekaran; Saravanakumar Mariappan; Sethuraman Ramadoss; Arjun Badimela; Aishwarya Krishnaswamy
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

6.  Penetration and Tensile Strength of Various Impression Materials of Vinylsiloxanether, Polyether, and Polyvinylsiloxane Impression Materials.

Authors:  Pongsakorn Apinsathanon; Bishwa Prakash Bhattarai; Suphachai Suphangul; Natthamet Wongsirichat; Napapa Aimjirakul
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-12-01

7.  Effect of cervical relining of acrylic resin copings on the accuracy of stone dies obtained using a polyether impression material.

Authors:  André Tomazini Gomes de Sá; César Antunes de Freitas; Fátima Cristina de Sá; Wagner José Silva Ursi; Tânia Christina Simões; Márcia Furtado Antunes de Freitas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.