Literature DB >> 15680391

Assessment of knot security in continuous intradermal wound closures.

Mark L Richey1, Simon C Roe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The traditionally used square knot used for commencement and termination of continuous wound closures is bulky, requiring a minimum of four to six throws to form a secure knot with most suture materials and sizes. This study evaluates the security of self-locking knots, which are significantly smaller in volume than the traditionally applied square knot, for the intradermal closure of standardized wounds in porcine skin. MATERIALS: Porcine skin samples with standardized wounds were closed in one of five patterns with 3/0 PDS suture. Wounds were harvested and tested to failure on a materials testing machine. Load at failure, ultimate elongation, wound stiffness, and mode of failure was determined for each sample.
RESULTS: Wound closures incorporating the chain stitch knot performed as well as closures incorporating the conventional square knot for load to failure, elongation, and stiffness. Partial slippage or complete knot failure of 4/40 (10%) of the square knots used in closures was observed. 0/20 (0%) of the chain stitch knots displayed slippage. The half-blood knot performed similarly to the square and chain stitch knot in load to failure, elongation, and stiffness, however, 16/20 (80%) of these knots displayed slippage or complete knot failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The chain stitch knot is as secure as the traditionally used square knot when used for termination of a continuous intradermal wound closure. This knot displays characteristics such as smaller knot volume and ease of applications that may make it a superior knot to the square knot in many clinical situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15680391     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

1.  Variability of surgical knot tying techniques: do we need to standardize?

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Thomas Bruckner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Jörg Höer; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions.

Authors:  Muhammad S Sajid; Malcolm R McFall; Pauline A Whitehouse; Parv S Sains
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-12-27

3.  A survey of current practices and influences on the choice of suture material, pattern and size used in commonly performed procedures in UK small animal veterinary practice.

Authors:  Elinor Jo Field; Suzanna Hebert; Ed J Friend; Kevin J Parsons
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2017-08-29

4.  Use of flexible sensor to characterize biomechanics of canine skin.

Authors:  Austin R J Downey; Jin Yan; Eric M Zellner; Karl H Kraus; Iris V Rivero; Simon Laflamme
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.741

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.