Literature DB >> 15679616

Comparison of the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia in the first cycle: a report of case series and meta-analysis.

Mohamed Ghanem1, Nagwa I Bakr, Maha A Elgayaar, Shymaa El Mongy, Hanan Fathy, Abdel-Hamid A Ibrahim.   

Abstract

To investigate the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh and cryopreserved-thawed testicular spermatozoa in the first cycle in patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), a total of 90 cases, 48 OA and 42 NOA were studied. All patients underwent sperm retrieval by testicular sperm extraction (TESE) while their wives received conventional ovarian hyperstimulation. The hormone levels, testicular histology, the rates of sperm retrieval, fertilization, implantation and pregnancy were analysed and evaluated. This study and other four similar studies were subjected to meta-analysis. Sperm retrieval was successful in 100% OA and 61% NOA. Fresh spermatozoa were used in 87.5% and 92.4% of OA and NOA cases respectively; while cryopreserved-thawed spermatozoa were used in 12.5% and 7.6% of OA and NOA, respectively. The fertilization, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were 65.5%, 15% and 25% respectively in OA group, and 54.2%, 5% and 23.1% respectively in NOA group. Sperm status (fresh or thawed), male partner's age, female age and male serum follicle-stimulating hormone had no significant effect upon fertilization rate, implantation rate, or pregnancy rate per embryo transfer. The results of meta-analysis indicate that there is no statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates between the two groups. There was a significantly higher fertilization rate among OA patients in all analysed studies (95% CI = 14.29-15.71, d.f. 832, T = 1.96). In conclusion, although the fertilization rate was significantly higher in the OA group in our study and from the given meta-analysis, there were some differences as regards pregnancy rates. Although the overall effect was more or less similar pregnancy rates in both subtypes of azoospermia, this may not be true if non-male infertility variables were controlled for in all studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15679616     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00491.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Androl        ISSN: 0105-6263


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes between Oligozoospermic, Obstructive Azoospermic and Non-Obstructive Azoospermic Patients.

Authors:  Ensieh Shahrokh Tehraninejad Tehraninejad; Elham Pourmatroud; Mohammad Ali Sadighi Gilani; Mahdi Rakebi; Zahra Azimi Neko; Arezoo Arabipoor
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-06-19

2.  Comparison of sperm retrieval and reproductive outcome in azoospermic men with testicular failure and obstructive azoospermia treated for infertility.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Christina Prudencio; Bill Seol; Sidney Verza; Christopher Knoedler; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Comparative Analysis of Surgically Retrieved Sperms in Cases of Obstructive and Nonobstructive Azoospermia Treated for Infertility.

Authors:  Deepa Talreja; Chirag Gupta; Hrishikesh Pai; Nandita Palshetkar; Rupin Shah
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-10-27

4.  Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in azoospermic men who underwent testicular sperm extraction vs. microdissection testicular sperm extraction: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Serajoddin Vahidi; Nima Narimani; Saeid Abouei; Ali Sadeghi; Keivan Lorian; Amirhossein Rahavian
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2021-10-10

5.  Combined Trifocal and Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction Enhances Sperm Retrieval Rate in Low-Chance Retrieval Non-Obstructive Azoospermia.

Authors:  Marco Falcone; Luca Boeri; Massimiliano Timpano; Lorenzo Cirigliano; Mirko Preto; Giorgio I Russo; Federica Peretti; Ilaria Ferro; Natalia Plamadeala; Paolo Gontero
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Reproductive outcomes, including neonatal data, following sperm injection in men with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia: case series and systematic review.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  A comprehensive review of genetics and genetic testing in azoospermia.

Authors:  Alaa J Hamada; Sandro C Esteves; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Paternal effects on early embryogenesis.

Authors:  Laszlo Nanassy; Douglas T Carrell
Journal:  J Exp Clin Assist Reprod       Date:  2008-05-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.