Literature DB >> 15677866

Differential efficacy of treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease over a 6-month period.

S López-Pousa1, A Turon-Estrada, J Garre-Olmo, I Pericot-Nierga, M Lozano-Gallego, M Vilalta-Franch, M Hernández-Ferràndiz, V Morante-Muñoz, A Isern-Vila, E Gelada-Batlle, J Majó-Llopart.   

Abstract

There are various anticholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). All AChEIs have shown greater efficacy than placebo in randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trials. No differential studies have yet been made of the efficacy between all AChEIs. The study aims to determine the differential efficacy of the AChEIs with respect to a historical sample of patients with AD that were not treated with AChEIs. An open-label, prospective, observational study with a retrospective control group was undertaken to examine the evolution of the cognitive function over a 6-month period. The patients were assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at study entry and at 6 months. A general linear model was applied for repeated measurements with the MMSE score as the dependent variable, treatment type as an independent variable and the severity of the deterioration, age and the MMSE baseline score as covariables. Of the sample of 147 patients, 40 initiated treatment with donepezil, 32 with galantamine, 30 with rivastigmine and 45 were part of a historical sample of the memory clinic patients between 1991 and 1996 that had not been treated with AChEIs. The average age was 73.7 years (SD = 6.9; range = 52-86), 67.3% were women, 78.2% of the cases were mild and the MMSE baseline score was 18.1 points (range = 11-27). No significant intergroup differences were observed in these variables. The average doses of donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine were 5.87 mg/day (SD = 1.92), 14.81 mg/day (SD = 6.25) and 6.41 mg/day (SD = 1.82), respectively. At 6 months, the difference in the MMSE score with respect to the untreated group was 1.6 points for donepezil (95% CI 0.79-2.37; p < 0.001), 0.99 points for galantamine (95% CI 0.14-1.85; p = 0.01) and 0.90 points for rivastigmine (95% CI 0.05-1.74; p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in the efficacy among the groups treated with AChEIs (p > 0.05). Treatment with AChEIs significantly delays the global cognitive impairment associated with AD for at least 6 months. Our study found no significant differences in efficacy between donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine. Further studies in the context of daily clinical practice will determine the clinical significance of the changes observed. An important variability of the response to the treatment was observed in treated patients. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15677866     DOI: 10.1159/000083498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord        ISSN: 1420-8008            Impact factor:   2.959


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current and emerging drug treatment options for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nathan Herrmann; Sarah A Chau; Ida Kircanski; Krista L Lanctôt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  A naturalistic study of galantamine for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Henry Brodaty; Michael Woodward; Karyn Boundy; Nicola Barnes; Gabrielle Allen
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Adherence and Tolerability of Alzheimer's Disease Medications: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Noll L Campbell; Anthony J Perkins; Sujuan Gao; Todd C Skaar; Lang Li; Hugh C Hendrie; Nicole Fowler; Christopher M Callahan; Malaz A Boustani
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  To treat or not to treat? A meta-analysis of the use of cholinesterase inhibitors in mild cognitive impairment for delaying progression to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Breno Satler Diniz; Jony Arrais Pinto; Maria Luiza Cavichioli Gonzaga; Fabiana Meira Guimarães; Wagner Farid Gattaz; Orestes Vicente Forlenza
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Predictors of long-term cognitive outcome in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Carina Wattmo; Asa K Wallin; Elisabet Londos; Lennart Minthon
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.982

6.  Identification of the optimal cognitive drugs among Alzheimer's disease: a Bayesian meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Jinghong Liang; Jiayu Li; Ruixia Jia; Yingquan Wang; Rongkun Wu; Hongbo Zhang; Lei Hang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 7.  Rivastigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: an update.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Onor; Marianna Trevisiol; Eugenio Aguglia
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Effects of the online computerized cognitive training program BEYNEX on the cognitive tests of individuals with subjective cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease on rivastigmine therapy

Authors:  Nilgün Çinar; Türker Ahmet Hasan Şahiner
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 0.973

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.