Literature DB >> 15677784

The efficacy and cost of alternative strategies for systematic screening for type 2 diabetes in the U.S. population 45-74 years of age.

Susan L Johnson1, Bahman P Tabaei, William H Herman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To simulate the outcomes of alternative strategies for screening the U.S. population 45-74 years of age for type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We simulated screening with random plasma glucose (RPG) and cut points of 100, 130, and 160 mg/dl and a multivariate equation including RPG and other variables. Over 15 years, we simulated screening at intervals of 1, 3, and 5 years. All positive screening tests were followed by a diagnostic fasting plasma glucose or an oral glucose tolerance test. Outcomes include the numbers of false-negative, true-positive, and false-positive screening tests and the direct and indirect costs.
RESULTS: At year 15, screening every 3 years with an RPG cut point of 100 mg/dl left 0.2 million false negatives, an RPG of 130 mg/dl or the equation left 1.3 million false negatives, and an RPG of 160 mg/dl left 2.8 million false negatives. Over 15 years, the absolute difference between the most sensitive and most specific screening strategy was 4.5 million true positives and 476 million false-positives. Strategies using RPG cut points of 130 mg/dl or the multivariate equation every 3 years identified 17.3 million true positives; however, the equation identified fewer false-positives. The total cost of the most sensitive screening strategy was $42.7 billion and that of the most specific strategy was $6.9 billion.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening for type 2 diabetes every 3 years with an RPG cut point of 130 mg/dl or the multivariate equation provides good yield and minimizes false-positive screening tests and costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15677784     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.2.307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  22 in total

Review 1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  The clinical use of hemoglobin A1c.

Authors:  Christopher D Saudek; Jessica C Brick
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

6.  San Antonio heart study diabetes prediction model applicable to a Middle Eastern population? Tehran glucose and lipid study.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Bozorgmanesh; Farzad Hadaegh; Azadeh Zabetian; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Performance of a Random Glucose Case-Finding Strategy to Detect Undiagnosed Diabetes.

Authors:  Michael E Bowen; Lei Xuan; Ildiko Lingvay; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Screening adults for pre-diabetes and diabetes may be cost-saving.

Authors:  Ranee Chatterjee; K M Venkat Narayan; Joseph Lipscomb; Lawrence S Phillips
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 17.152

10.  Prevalence of elevated hemoglobin A1c among patients admitted to the hospital without a diagnosis of diabetes.

Authors:  Deborah J Wexler; David M Nathan; Richard W Grant; Susan Regan; Allison L Van Leuvan; Enrico Cagliero
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.