Literature DB >> 15677780

Acceptability and satisfaction with a telecarer approach to the management of type 2 diabetes.

Andrew F Long1, Tina Gambling, Robert J Young, Jean Taylor, James M Mason.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine patients' views of the acceptability of and satisfaction with telephone care center support provided to improve blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Pro-Active Call-Center Treatment Support (PACCTS) Trial randomized patients from 47 general practices in a deprived urban area in northwest England to usual care or to proactive call center support in addition to usual care. Satisfaction with care was assessed in all 591 patients at baseline and the end of the study using the Diabetes Satisfaction and Treatment Questionnaire (DTSQ). Acceptability was assessed in 394 intervention patients after at least three proactive calls from the call center and at the end of the trial. A purposive sample of 25 patients took part in in-depth semistructured interviews.
RESULTS: The response rates to the questionnaires were 79% (DTSQ) and 65% (acceptability). Persons receiving the intervention continued to report high levels of satisfaction with their treatment (95% CI 32.3-33.2 at 1 year), and >90% strongly agreed or agreed that the telecarer approach was acceptable. Qualitative comments pointed to the importance of a personalized service; increased feelings of well-being, including confidence and self-control; help with problem-solving; and patients developing rapport and a strong bond with the telecarers.
CONCLUSIONS: A personalized PACCTS approach is acceptable to patients. A service giving priority to the interpersonal dimension leads to increased commitment from patients to improve long-term glycemic control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15677780     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.2.283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  11 in total

1.  A meta-synthesis of behavioral outcomes from telemedicine clinical trials for type 2 diabetes and the Clinical User-Experience Evaluation (CUE).

Authors:  Sakib Jalil; Trina Myers; Ian Atkinson
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  The outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus after a telecare approach are not inferior to traditional outpatient clinic visits.

Authors:  Natalia Pérez-Ferre; Mercedes Galindo; M Dolores Fernández; Victoria Velasco; Isabelle Runkle; M José de la Cruz; Patricia Martín Rojas-Marcos; Laura Del Valle; Alfonso L Calle-Pascual
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.257

3.  Enhancing health literacy and behavioural change within a tele-care education and support intervention for people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Andrew F Long; Tina Gambling
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Patient Preference and Satisfaction with the Use of Telemedicine for Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Review.

Authors:  Ruth Sim; Shaun Wen Huey Lee
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 5.  Patient and public perception and experience of community pharmacy services post-discharge in the UK: a rapid review and qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah Khayyat; Philippa Walters; Cate Whittlesea; Hamde Nazar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Telehealth strategy to mitigate the negative psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Janine Alessi; Giovana Berger de Oliveira; Debora Wilke Franco; Alice Scalzilli Becker; Carolina Padilla Knijnik; Gabriel Luiz Kobe; Bibiana Brino Amaral; Ariane de Brito; Beatriz D Schaan; Gabriela Heiden Telo
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.087

Review 7.  A qualitative synthesis of diabetes self-management strategies for long term medical outcomes and quality of life in the UK.

Authors:  Julia Frost; Ruth Garside; Chris Cooper; Nicky Britten
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The acceptability to patients of PhysioDirect telephone assessment and advice services; a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Jennifer Pearson; Jane Richardson; Michael Calnan; Chris Salisbury; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Assessment of Patients' Perception of Telemedicine Services Using the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Claudio Dario; Elena Luisotto; Enrico Dal Pozzo; Silvia Mancin; Vassilis Aletras; Stanton Newman; Lorenzo Gubian; Claudio Saccavini
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.120

10.  The Inclusion of Ethnic Minority Patients and the Role of Language in Telehealth Trials for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Talia Isaacs; Daniel Hunt; Danielle Ward; Leila Rooshenas; Louisa Edwards
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.