Literature DB >> 15677599

Lower effectiveness of divalproex versus valproic acid in a prospective, quasi-experimental clinical trial involving 9,260 psychiatric admissions.

Adel A Wassef1, Diane E Winkler, Ann L Roache, Vivian Boma Abobo, Lina M Lopez, John P Averill, Ayesha I Mian, John E Overall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined clinical differences between divalproex sodium and generic immediate-release valproic acid.
METHOD: This 6-year prospective, quasi-experimental clinical trial compared the effectiveness and tolerability of divalproex and valproic acid. The dependent variables were length of hospital stay, rehospitalization rate, and adverse drug reactions in 9,260 psychiatric admissions.
RESULTS: Inpatients who initially received divalproex sodium had a 32.7% longer hospital stay and 3.8% higher readmission rate than did patients who initially received valproic acid. Initial treatment with divalproex prolonged length of stay by 30.3% in patients treated with divalproex and valproic acid during different admissions. After other variables were controlled by multiway analysis of variance, the hospital stay of patients who continued the initial medication was 15.2% longer (2.0 days) for divalproex than valproic acid. Switching medications was more common for valproic acid, partly because of study design. Medication intolerance occurred in approximately 6.4% more patients taking valproic acid than divalproex. However, switching from valproic acid to divalproex did not significantly prolong length of stay, over that for continuous divalproex, or increase the rehospitalization rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower peak valproate concentrations with divalproex sodium may have enhanced tolerability but may also explain the lower effectiveness. Extended-release divalproex could lower effectiveness further and require higher doses. Thus, inpatients are better served by beginning with generic valproic acid and by changing to delayed-release divalproex only if intolerance occurs. This would save up to one-third of inpatient costs and two-thirds of a billion dollars yearly in medication costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15677599     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  5 in total

Review 1.  Switching from brand-name to generic psychotropic medications: a literature review.

Authors:  Julie Eve Desmarais; Linda Beauclair; Howard C Margolese
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 5.243

2.  Evidence for association of hyperprolinemia with schizophrenia and a measure of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Catherine L Clelland; Laura L Read; Amanda N Baraldi; Corinne P Bart; Carrie A Pappas; Laura J Panek; Robert H Nadrich; James D Clelland
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  The dynamics of DNA methylation in schizophrenia and related psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Dennis R Grayson; Alessandro Guidotti
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Quality of reporting of bioequivalence trials comparing generic to brand name drugs: a methodological systematic review.

Authors:  Amélie van der Meersch; Agnès Dechartres; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Potential problems and recommendations regarding substitution of generic antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Muhammad Atif; Muhammad Azeem; Muhammad Rehan Sarwar
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.