Literature DB >> 15677064

Evaluation of perceived and self-reported manual forces exerted in occupational materials handling.

C Wiktorin1, K Selin, L Ekenvall, A Kilbom, L Alfredsson.   

Abstract

The main objective of the study was to evaluate the ability of workers to reproduce simulated manual work forces correctly and to quantify these forces in Newtons (N) by means of self-reports. Fourteen male and 14 female workers participated in the study. Three experiments were carried out. In the first experiment, the ability to reproduce the magnitudes of simulated manual forces occurring in daily work and to estimate these forces in Newtons was tested. A specially designed force-measuring device was used for this purpose. In the second experiment, the subjects estimated the weights of five boxes ranging from 1 to 30 kg. In the third experiment, the subjects were asked to produce five predetermined push and pull forces ranging in magnitude from 10 to 300 N on to the handle of the force-measuring device. The ability to reproduce the magnitudes of manual forces when simulating four familiar work tasks was good (the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.75 to 0.95). The ability to quantify these forces in Newtons was not as good (the product moment correlation coefficients ranged from 0.21 to 0.69). When the subjects estimated the weights of boxes they underestimated the weights. When they produced predetermined push and pull forces they exerted higher forces than expected when low force levels were requested and lower forces when high force levels were requested. However, the forces were correctly ranked. In summary, simulation of the manual push/pull forces used in familiar work tasks seemed to offer sufficient reproducibility to be worth testing for validity. Self-reports, used without previous training or without known 'reference forces', seemed to be very rough when the aim was to estimate in kg or Newtons. However, the fact that individuals could rank the forces correctly opens a potential for refinement of self-reports as a method for quantifying manual forces in objective terms, e.g. kg or Newtons.

Year:  1996        PMID: 15677064     DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(96)00006-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  7 in total

1.  The role of cumulative physical work load in lumbar spine disease: risk factors for lumbar osteochondrosis and spondylosis associated with chronic complaints.

Authors:  A Seidler; U Bolm-Audorff; H Heiskel; N Henkel; B Roth-Küver; U Kaiser; R Bickeböller; W J Willingstorfer; W Beck; G Elsner
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  The influence of work-related exposures on the prognosis of neck/shoulder pain.

Authors:  Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten; Marie Mulder; Malin Josephson; Lars Alfredsson; Christina Wiktorin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Assessment of mechanical exposure in ergonomic epidemiology.

Authors:  A J van der Beek; M H Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Work-related lesions of the supraspinatus tendon: a case-control study.

Authors:  Andreas Seidler; Ulrich Bolm-Audorff; Gabriela Petereit-Haack; Elke Ball; Magdalena Klupp; Noëlle Krauss; Gine Elsner
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Assessing agreement of self-reported and observed physical exposures of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Ann Marie Dale; Jaime Strickland; Bethany Gardner; Juergen Symanzik; Bradley Allen Evanoff
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

6.  The role of cumulative physical work load in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis - a case-control study in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Seidler; Ulrich Bolm-Audorff; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Gine Elsner
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.646

7.  The roles of lumbar load thresholds in cumulative lifting exposure to predict disk protrusion in an Asian population.

Authors:  Isabella Y-J Hung; Tiffany T-F Shih; Bang-Bin Chen; Saou-Hsing Liou; Ing-Kang Ho; Yue Leon Guo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.