Literature DB >> 1567678

DNA damage by drugs and radiation: what is important and how is it measured?

S J Whitaker1.   

Abstract

DNA is the most important target for drug and radiation induced cell killing. The mode of cell killing by cytotoxic drugs and radiation has been derived by correlating the type and quantity of DNA damage induced with lethality. Cytotoxic drugs can be classified by their main mode of action, while ionising radiation causes a range of lesions with the DNA double-strand break (dsb) being the most significant. Strand-breaks are measured from the reduction in the size of DNA molecules following treatment. Molecule size can be derived from the rate that DNA fragments sediment when centrifuged, elute through filters or migrate under electrophoresis. The effect of strand-breaks on DNA loop supercoiling allow a sensitive assay of DNA damage. Specific assays for base damage and drug adducts include changes in chromatographic mobility or binding by specific antibodies. By comparing the levels of damage in the genome overall with damage in specific gene targets, regions susceptible to damage induction, and varying in repair efficiency, have been revealed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1567678     DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90432-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  12 in total

1.  In vivo antioxidative effect of isoquercitrin on cadmium-induced oxidative damage to mouse liver and kidney.

Authors:  Ruijin Li; Chao Yuan; Chuan Dong; Shaomin Shuang; Martin M F Choi
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Sulforaphane suppresses the growth of glioblastoma cells, glioblastoma stem cell-like spheroids, and tumor xenografts through multiple cell signaling pathways.

Authors:  Khadijeh Bijangi-Vishehsaraei; M Reza Saadatzadeh; Haiyan Wang; Angie Nguyen; Malgorzata M Kamocka; Wenjing Cai; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Stacey L Halum; Jann N Sarkaria; Karen E Pollok; Ahmad R Safa
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  Do Cancer and Cancer Treatments Accelerate Aging?

Authors:  Roma Bhatia; Shernan Holtan; Najla El Jurdi; Anna Prizment; Anne Blaes
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Preferential binding to branched DNA strands and strand-annealing activity of the human Rad51B, Rad51C, Rad51D and Xrcc2 protein complex.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yokoyama; Naoyuki Sarai; Wataru Kagawa; Rima Enomoto; Takehiko Shibata; Hitoshi Kurumizaka; Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Region and amino acid residues required for Rad51C binding in the human Xrcc3 protein.

Authors:  Hitoshi Kurumizaka; Rima Enomoto; Maki Nakada; Keiko Eda; Shigeyuki Yokoyama; Takehiko Shibata
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Stimulation of Dmc1-mediated DNA strand exchange by the human Rad54B protein.

Authors:  Naoyuki Sarai; Wataru Kagawa; Takashi Kinebuchi; Ako Kagawa; Kozo Tanaka; Kiyoshi Miyagawa; Shukuko Ikawa; Takehiko Shibata; Hitoshi Kurumizaka; Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Homologous pairing activities of two rice RAD51 proteins, RAD51A1 and RAD51A2.

Authors:  Yuichi Morozumi; Ryohei Ino; Shukuko Ikawa; Naozumi Mimida; Takeshi Shimizu; Seiichi Toki; Hiroaki Ichikawa; Takehiko Shibata; Hitoshi Kurumizaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Radiotherapy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Chao Rong; Étienne Fasolt Richard Corvin Meinert; Jochen Hess
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  DIDS, a chemical compound that inhibits RAD51-mediated homologous pairing and strand exchange.

Authors:  Takako Ishida; Yoshimasa Takizawa; Takashi Kainuma; Jin Inoue; Tsutomu Mikawa; Takehiko Shibata; Hidekazu Suzuki; Satoshi Tashiro; Hitoshi Kurumizaka
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Roles of XRCC2, RAD51B and RAD51D in RAD51-independent SSA recombination.

Authors:  Heïdi Serra; Olivier Da Ines; Fabienne Degroote; Maria E Gallego; Charles I White
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.