Literature DB >> 15676050

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of different doses of fentanyl following sublingual administration of a rapidly dissolving tablet to cancer patients: a new approach to treatment of incident pain.

B Lennernäs1, T Hedner, M Holmberg, S Bredenberg, C Nyström, H Lennernäs.   

Abstract

AIMS: It is estimated that two-thirds of cancer patients will at some point during their illness experience breakthrough pain. In this study, the pharmacokinetics of a novel sublingual dosage form of fentanyl developed for breakthrough pain was evaluated.
METHODS: Eleven Caucasian patients (seven male and 4 female, aged 34-75 years, median 60 years) with metastatic malignant disease were recruited initially, but three patients withdrew. Prior to the study all patients were on continuous nonfentanyl opiate medication. The study was a double-blind, cross-over trial, consisting of three 1-day treatment periods. A new rapidly dissolving preparation of fentanyl, was administered sublingually in single doses of 100, 200 and 400 microg, respectively, on three separate occasions. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartment analysis. Tolerability and the occurrence of adverse events were monitored throughout the study by patient questionnaire.
RESULTS: The data from nine subjects who completed at least two periods were used in the analysis of variance. There were no significant differences between doses (100, 200 and 400 microg) for dose adjusted AUC (F = 0.42, P = 0.6660), dose adjusted C(max) (F = 0.08, P = 0.9206) and Tmax (F = 0.94, P = 0.4107). Thus, these parameters showed dose proportionality. The differences (400-100microg) in dose adjusted AUC from the three-period crossover analysis was -0.016 min.ng/ml (t = 0.71, P = 0.8718). Interindividual variability in systemic exposure to fentanyl was fairly small (25-40%), which may be related to a good in vivo biopharmaceutical performance of the sublingual tablet, and a relatively small fraction of the dose being swallowed. The first detectable plasma concentration of fentanyl was observed between 8 and 11 min after administration. t(max) increased from 39.7 +/- 17.4 to 48.7 +/- 26.3 and 56.7 +/- 24.6 min for the 100, 200 and 400 microg doses, respectively. Adverse events were few and did not increase with increasing dose.
CONCLUSION: With this rapidly dissolving fentanyl formulation, the first detectable plasma concentration of fentanyl was observed at 8-11 min after administration. The pharmacokinetics of the drug showed dose proportionately. This formulation of fentanyl seemed to be well tolerated by the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15676050      PMCID: PMC1884753          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02264.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  19 in total

1.  Reproducible fentanyl doses delivered intermittently at different time intervals from an electrotransport system.

Authors:  S K Gupta; G Sathyan; B Phipps; M Klausner; M Southam
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  The possibility of achieving an interactive mixture with high dose homogeneity containing an extremely low proportion of a micronised drug.

Authors:  S Sundell-Bredenberg; C Nyström
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  Oral transmucosal fentanyl and sufentanil for incident pain.

Authors:  J Gardner-Nix
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Solubility and related physicochemical properties of narcotic analgesics.

Authors:  S D Roy; G L Flynn
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Transdermal delivery of narcotic analgesics: comparative permeabilities of narcotic analgesics through human cadaver skin.

Authors:  S D Roy; G L Flynn
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Breakthrough cancer pain: a randomized trial comparing oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) and morphine sulfate immediate release (MSIR).

Authors:  P H Coluzzi; L Schwartzberg; J D Conroy; S Charapata; M Gay; M A Busch; J Chavez; J Ashley; D Lebo; M McCracken; R K Portenoy
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 7.  New strategies in opioid therapy for cancer pain.

Authors:  N Cherny
Journal:  J Oncol Manag       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

Review 8.  Breakthrough pain: assessment and management in cancer patients.

Authors:  C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2001 Jul 12-25

Review 9.  Oral mucosal drug delivery: clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Jie Zhang; James B Streisand
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Nasal administration of opioids for pain management in adults.

Authors:  O Dale; R Hjortkjaer; E D Kharasch
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.105

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  [Cancer breakthrough pain. Indications for rapidly effective opioids].

Authors:  J Kessler; H J Bardenheuer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Newer generation fentanyl transmucosal products for breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant cancer patients.

Authors:  Frank Elsner; Giovambattista Zeppetella; Josep Porta-Sales; Ignacio Tagarro
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Abstral (Fentanyl Sublingual Tablets for Breakthrough Cancer Pain).

Authors: 
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-02

4.  Efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet at doses determined by titration for the treatment of breakthrough pain in Japanese cancer patients: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial.

Authors:  Naohito Shimoyama; Ikuo Gomyo; Nobuyuki Katakami; Masakuni Okada; Nobuyuki Yukitoshi; Eri Ohta; Megumi Shimoyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Fentanyl sublingual: in breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adults with cancer.

Authors:  Claudine M Chwieduk; Kate McKeage
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Breakthrough pain in elderly patients with cancer: treatment options.

Authors:  Sophie Pautex; Nicole Vogt-Ferrier; Gilbert B Zulian
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Management of breakthrough pain in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Leeroy William; Rod Macleod
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Fentanyl for the treatment of tumor-related breakthrough pain.

Authors:  Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti; Mischa Wejbora; Istvan S Szilagyi; Andreas Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  Assessment and management of breakthrough pain in cancer patients: current approaches and emerging research.

Authors:  Neil A Hagen; Patricia Biondo; Carla Stiles
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2008-08

Review 10.  Pharmacokinetics of non-intravenous formulations of fentanyl.

Authors:  Jörn Lötsch; Carmen Walter; Michael J Parnham; Bruno G Oertel; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.