Literature DB >> 15676045

Efficacy and safety of three ophthalmic inserts for topical anaesthesia of the cornea. An exploratory comparative dose-ranging, double-blind, randomized trial in healthy volunteers.

Isabelle Mahé1, Stéphane Mouly, Irène Jarrin, Jacqueline Otéro, Catherine Tavera, Guy Simoneau, Yves Tillet, Robert Conti, Saïd El Meski, Alain Gaudric, Jean-François Bergmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery requires prolonged anaesthesia, concomitant with permanent hydration and lubrication of the cornea, in order to provide a clear view of the operation area. AIMS: The primary objective of the study was to assess several formulae of a soluble ophthalmic insert: TOPICSERT [bupivacaine (Bupi) + hyaluronic acid (HA) or sodium hyaluronate] in terms of complete and long-lasting anaesthesia of the cornea. The hydration properties of HA were not assessed in this study.
METHODS: In a prospective double-blind, cross-over, randomized study, with latin-square allocation of treatments, 16 healthy volunteers received a single dose of each formula (A, 1 mg Bupi and 0.1 mg HA; B, 0.5 mg Bupi and 0.1 mg HA; C, 1 mg Bupi and 0 mg HA, and D acting as a placebo) via the ocular route with 1 week of wash-out between each period. Corneal anaesthesia was measured using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between treatments with regard to the main criterion (complete anaesthesia lasting at least 20 min) when general association statistics were used (Mantel-Haenzel test, P < 0.0001): 68.75% (n = 11) of subjects receiving treatment A, 37.5% (n = 6) receiving treatment B, and 87.5% (n = 14) on treatment C reached complete and satisfactory anaesthesia, while this was not achieved in any of the subjects receiving placebo. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals of the difference between treatments were as follows: treatment A vs. B (-0.03, 0.66), treatment A vs. C (-0.47, 0.10), treatment B vs. C (-0.84, - 0.16). Only the difference between B and C was statistically significant (adjusted probability by the method of Bonferroni, P < 0.001). When complete anaesthesia was reached, mean (+/-SD) duration of anaesthesia was as follows: 20.7 (+/-6.5), 15.3 (+/-11.4) and 24.7 (+/-7.6) min for treatments A, B, C, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine 1 mg seems to be the efficient and safe dose. The value of hyaluronic acid as a corneal hydration agent and used in association with bupivacaine will be the subject of further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15676045      PMCID: PMC1884755          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02245.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  11 in total

1.  Resistance to local analgesia--report of a case treated using 5% lignocaine solution.

Authors:  H A Beckett; A G Gilmour
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1990-11-24       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Extreme resistance to general anaesthetics.

Authors:  A Warmington
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 3.  Duke-Elder lecture. Prospects for the dry eye.

Authors:  A J Bron
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1985

4.  A comparison of topical and retrobulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery.

Authors:  B C Patel; T A Burns; A Crandall; S T Shomaker; N L Pace; A van Eerd; T Clinch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  A series of truly failed spinal anesthetics.

Authors:  S I Schmidt; S S Moorthy; S F Dierdorf; J M Anagnostou
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 9.452

6.  Comparison of the tolerability and efficacy of unit-dose, preservative-free topical ocular anaesthetics.

Authors:  J G Lawrenson; D F Edgar; G K Tanna; A C Gudgeon
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Patient comfort during cataract surgery with modified topical and peribulbar anesthesia.

Authors:  H Maclean; T Burton; A Murray
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Topical bupivacaine and proparacaine: a comparison of toxicity, onset of action, and duration of action.

Authors:  J C Liu; T L Steinemann; M B McDonald; H W Thompson; R W Beuerman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Topical versus peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Gangolf Sauder; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2003-12

10.  A comparative study of the duration and efficacy of tetracaine 1% and bupivacaine 0.75% in controlling pain following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Authors:  S Verma; M C Corbett; A Patmore; G Heacock; J Marshall
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.922

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthesia for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Emmanuel Nouvellon; Philippe Cuvillon; Jacques Ripart; Eric J Viel
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Hyaluronan Does Not Affect Bupivacaine's Inhibitory Action on Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel Activities in Bovine Articular Chondrocytes.

Authors:  William Hester; Jinnan Yang; Guo-Yong Wang; Sen Liu; Michael J O'Brien; Felix H Savoie; Zongbing You
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-04-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.