Literature DB >> 15675988

The relationship between bispectral index and targeted propofol concentration is biphasic in patients with major burns.

T-H Han1, J-H Lee, In-Suk Kwak, H-Y Kil, K-W Han, K-M Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many pathophysiologic alterations in major burns can cause changes in the distribution of, and perhaps response to, drugs commonly used in anesthesia practice. This study was conducted to assess changes in bispectral index (BIS) caused by increasing the target propofol effect-site concentration during a target-controlled infusion (TCI) in major burns.
METHODS: Eighteen patients, ASA physical status 2 or 3, aged from 20 to 55 years old, weighing 50-70 kg, with major burns, scheduled for elective early escharectomy less than a week after injury were recruited. A further 18 ASA physical status class 1 or 2, non-burns, age, sex- and weight-matched adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited as controls. During anesthesia induction, target propofol effect-site concentrations were increased by increments of 0.5 microg ml(-1) up to 4.5 microg ml(-1). The BIS responses to each target concentration using TCI were compared in both groups.
RESULTS: In the burns group, significantly greater BIS values relating to increasing propofol TCI were noted at deeper anesthesia when compared with controls; at > or =3.5 microg ml(-1); mean BIS remained at a plateau of about 50. Patients with burns had higher cardiac indices, and lower hemoglobin and albumin concentrations than the controls. They consumed more vecuronium to maintain the same degree of neuromuscular blockade than the controls.
CONCLUSIONS: In major burns, the final biphasic BIS responses appeared to be determined by numerous other variables such as BIS algorithm, TCI performance, and altered propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. According to our results the importance of an individually tailored approach, including careful anesthetic titration, based upon the patient's clinical condition and responses can not be overemphasized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15675988     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00532.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  3 in total

1.  Effects of the anesthetic agent propofol on neural populations.

Authors:  Axel Hutt; Andre Longtin
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Tissue accumulation of cephalothin in burns: a comparative study by microdialysis of subcutaneous interstitial fluid cephalothin concentrations in burn patients and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Andrew J Dalley; Jeffrey Lipman; Renae Deans; Bala Venkatesh; Michael Rudd; Michael S Roberts; Sheree E Cross
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Influence of burns on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in the care of burn patients.

Authors:  Benoit Blanchet; Vincent Jullien; Christophe Vinsonneau; Michel Tod
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.