BACKGROUND: Recently, new drugs and techniques for the treatment of postoperative pain were introduced, with the goal of enhancing opiates' analgesia while minimizing their side-effects. Cholinergic agents play an antinociceptive role, but their clinical use is quite limited, due to side-effects. Physostigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor, which crosses the blood-brain barrier and elevates brain acetylcholine level. Physostigmine can produce analgesia by itself, and enhance opiate analgesia; but these effects are of short duration following bolus administration. METHODS: We compared pain intensity and morphine consumption in two postoperative treatment groups: One group received continuous physostigmine infusion combined with morphine-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and the other received PCA alone. Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathways have recently been described. We therefore also compared changes in proinflammatory cytokine production in the two pain management groups. RESULTS: Continuous infusion of physostigmine combined with morphine-based PCA in the postoperative period significantly reduced opiate consumption, and enhanced the analgesic response. Patients in the physostigmine group also exhibited reduced ex-vivo production of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-1beta. At the same time, physostigmine increased nausea and vomiting, mostly in the first 2 h of the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS:Physostigmine combined with morphine in the postoperative period reduced morphine consumption, enhanced analgesia, and attenuated production of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-1beta. This latter finding may account for the decreased pain observed in this group; this cytokine is known to mediate basal pain sensitivity and induce hyperalgesia in inflammatory conditions. Taking into account the other potential beneficial effects of physostigmine, we suggest that a continuous infusion of physostigmine should be considered as a useful component in multimodal postoperative analgesia.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Recently, new drugs and techniques for the treatment of postoperative pain were introduced, with the goal of enhancing opiates' analgesia while minimizing their side-effects. Cholinergic agents play an antinociceptive role, but their clinical use is quite limited, due to side-effects. Physostigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor, which crosses the blood-brain barrier and elevates brain acetylcholine level. Physostigmine can produce analgesia by itself, and enhance opiate analgesia; but these effects are of short duration following bolus administration. METHODS: We compared pain intensity and morphine consumption in two postoperative treatment groups: One group received continuous physostigmine infusion combined with morphine-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and the other received PCA alone. Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathways have recently been described. We therefore also compared changes in proinflammatory cytokine production in the two pain management groups. RESULTS: Continuous infusion of physostigmine combined with morphine-based PCA in the postoperative period significantly reduced opiate consumption, and enhanced the analgesic response. Patients in the physostigmine group also exhibited reduced ex-vivo production of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-1beta. At the same time, physostigmine increased nausea and vomiting, mostly in the first 2 h of the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS:Physostigmine combined with morphine in the postoperative period reduced morphine consumption, enhanced analgesia, and attenuated production of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-1beta. This latter finding may account for the decreased pain observed in this group; this cytokine is known to mediate basal pain sensitivity and induce hyperalgesia in inflammatory conditions. Taking into account the other potential beneficial effects of physostigmine, we suggest that a continuous infusion of physostigmine should be considered as a useful component in multimodal postoperative analgesia.
Authors: Johannes B Zimmermann; Nadine Pinder; Thomas Bruckner; Monika Lehmann; Johann Motsch; Thorsten Brenner; Torsten Hoppe-Tichy; Stefanie Swoboda; Markus A Weigand; Stefan Hofer Journal: Trials Date: 2017-11-10 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Diane I Bitzinger; Michael Gruber; Simon Tümmler; Manuela Malsy; Timo Seyfried; Florian Weber; Andreas Redel; Bernhard M Graf; York A Zausig Journal: Mediators Inflamm Date: 2019-01-20 Impact factor: 4.711