Literature DB >> 15674928

Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery.

T Werawatganon1, S Charuluxanun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are two common techniques for postoperative pain control after intra-abdominal surgery: patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous opioids and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA). It is uncertain which method has better pain control and fewer adverse effects.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to compare PCA opioid therapy with CEA for pain control after intra-abdominal surgery in terms of analgesic efficacy, side effects, patient satisfaction and surgical outcome by meta-analysis of the relevant trials. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2002), MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2002), EMBASE (January 1988 to October 2002), and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of adult patients after intra-abdominal surgery comparing the effect of two pain control regimens in terms of analgesic efficacy and side effects. In the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) group the patient should be able to operate the device himself. In the continuous epidural analgesia group there was no PCA device. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. MAIN
RESULTS: Nine studies involving 711 participants were included. The PCA group had a higher pain visual analogue scale than the CEA group during 6, 24 and 72 hour periods. The weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval of resting pain was 1.74 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.19), 0.99 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.33), and 0.63 (95% CI 0.24 to 1.01), respectively. The length of hospital stay and other adverse effects were not statistically different except that the incidence of pruritus was lower in the PCA group, odds ratio of 0.27 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.64). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: CEA is superior to opioid PCA in relieving postoperative pain for up to 72 hours in patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery, but it is associated with a higher incidence of pruritus. There is insufficient evidence to draw comparisons about the other advantages and disadvantages of these two methods of pain relief.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15674928     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004088.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  64 in total

Review 1.  Implementation of a standardized pain management in a pediatric surgery unit.

Authors:  B Messerer; A Gutmann; A Weinberg; A Sandner-Kiesling
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Beneficial effects of adding ketamine to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl after the Nuss procedure in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Moon Ho Cha; Ji Hye Eom; Yoon Sook Lee; Woon Young Kim; Young Cheol Park; Sam Hong Min; Jae Hwan Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 3.  The opioid component of delayed gastrointestinal recovery after bowel resection.

Authors:  Timothy L Beard; John B Leslie; Jeffrey Nemeth
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  [Concepts for perioperative pain therapy. A critical stocktaking].

Authors:  S Reichl; E Pogatzki-Zahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Perioperative pain management: what is evidence based?].

Authors:  D Meisenzahl; J Souquet; P Kessler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Postoperative pain control.

Authors:  Veerabhadram Garimella; Christina Cellini
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  [Anesthesiologic procedure for elective aortic surgery].

Authors:  J Knapp; M Bernhard; H Rauch; A Hyhlik-Dürr; D Böckler; A Walther
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 8.  Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Peter Choi; Santhanam Suresh; Natalie Albert; Sandra Kopp; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-25

9.  Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-03-25

Review 10.  Perioperative management in distal pancreatectomy: results of a survey in 23 European participating centres of the DISPACT trial and a review of literature.

Authors:  Helge Bruns; Nuh N Rahbari; Thorsten Löffler; Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Christoph Schuhmacher; Inga Rossion; Markus W Büchler; Tido Junghans
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.