Literature DB >> 15673548

Computational modeling suggests that response properties rather than spatial position determine connectivity between olfactory glomeruli.

Christiane Linster1, Silke Sachse, C Giovanni Galizia.   

Abstract

Olfactory responses require the representation of high-dimensional olfactory stimuli within the constraints of two-dimensional neural networks. We used a computational model of the honeybee antennal lobe to test how inhibitory interactions in the antennal lobe should be organized to best reproduce the experimentally measured input-output function in this structure. Our simulations show that a functionally organized inhibitory network, as opposed to an anatomically or all-to-all organized inhibitory network, best reproduces the input-output function of the antennal lobe observed with calcium imaging. In this network, inhibition between each pair of glomeruli was proportional to the similarity of their odor-response profiles. We conclude that contrast enhancement between odorants in the honeybee antennal lobe is best achieved when interglomerular inhibition is organized based on glomerular odor response profiles rather than on anatomical neighborhood relations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15673548     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01285.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Histamine-immunoreactive local neurons in the antennal lobes of the hymenoptera.

Authors:  Andrew M Dacks; Carolina E Reisenman; Angelique C Paulk; Alan J Nighorn
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Viral tracing identifies distributed columnar organization in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  David C Willhite; Katherine T Nguyen; Arjun V Masurkar; Charles A Greer; Gordon M Shepherd; Wei R Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Activity-dependent gating of lateral inhibition in the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Armen C Arevian; Vikrant Kapoor; Nathaniel N Urban
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-16       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Processing and classification of chemical data inspired by insect olfaction.

Authors:  Michael Schmuker; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pattern orthogonalization via channel decorrelation by adaptive networks.

Authors:  Stuart D Wick; Martin T Wiechert; Rainer W Friedrich; Hermann Riecke
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  A model of non-elemental olfactory learning in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jan Wessnitzer; Joanna M Young; J Douglas Armstrong; Barbara Webb
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Mind the gap: olfactory trace conditioning in honeybees.

Authors:  Paul Szyszka; Christiane Demmler; Mariann Oemisch; Ludwig Sommer; Stephanie Biergans; Benjamin Birnbach; Ana F Silbering; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Innate recognition of pheromone and food odors in moths: a common mechanism in the antennal lobe?

Authors:  Joshua P Martin; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Is there a space-time continuum in olfaction?

Authors:  Michael Leon; Brett A Johnson
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.