Literature DB >> 15673528

Measurement of cartilage volumes in rheumatoid arthritis using MRI.

S J Gandy1, A D Brett, P A Dieppe, M C Keen, R A Maciewicz, C J Taylor, J C Waterton, I Watt.   

Abstract

MRI is a valuable imaging modality for assessment of the articular cartilage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is potentially of use in monitoring disease progression and response to therapy. In this study, we investigated the sources of error in volume measurements obtained by segmentation of MR images of knee cartilage in patients with RA and followed cartilage volume in a group of RA patients for 12 months. 23 RA patient volunteers were recruited for knee imaging. Six subjects were imaged at baseline only, six were imaged at baseline and again within an hour in the same imaging session, six subjects were imaged at baseline and 7 days, and 17 subjects were imaged at baseline, 4+/-2 months and 12 months. Imaging was performed at 1.0 T using a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequence with fat-suppression. Manual image segmentation was performed once or twice on the lateral tibial, medial tibial, patellar and femoral compartment by either one or two segmenters. Coefficients of variation (CoV) for repeated volume measurement of total cartilage were 2.2% (same segmenter, same scan), 5.2% (different segmenter, same scan), 4.9% (same segmenter, different scan, same session), and 4.4% (same segmenter, different scan, different session). Over the 12 month duration of the study there was no significant change in total cartilage volume, nor were there significant changes in volume in any individual compartment. This measurement technique is reproducible, but any net change in cartilage volume over 1 year is very small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15673528     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/79023662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  3 in total

1.  Cartilage quality in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of T2* mapping, native T1 mapping, dGEMRIC, ΔR1 and value of pre-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Christian Buchbender; Axel Scherer; Patric Kröpil; Birthe Körbl; Michael Quentin; Dorothea Ch Reichelt; Rotem S Lanzman; Christian Mathys; Dirk Blondin; Bernd Bittersohl; Christoph Zilkens; Matthias Hofer; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Matthias Schneider; Gerald Antoch; Benedikt Ostendorf; Falk Miese
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Evaluation of cartilage degradation in arthritis using T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging mapping.

Authors:  Hidetoshi Tsushima; Ken Okazaki; Yukihisa Takayama; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Hiroshi Honda; Toshiaki Izawa; Yasuharu Nakashima; Hisakata Yamada; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Diagnostic quality and scoring of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in low-field MRI of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional MRI.

Authors:  Claudia Schirmer; Alexander K Scheel; Christian E Althoff; Tania Schink; Iris Eshed; Alexander Lembcke; Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester; Marina Backhaus; Bernd Hamm; Kay-Geert A Hermann
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 19.103

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.