Literature DB >> 1567344

Individual differences in the selective processing of threatening information, and emotional responses to a stressful life event.

C MacLeod1, R Hagan.   

Abstract

Previous research has established that high levels of trait anxiety commonly are associated with an automatic pattern of encoding selectivity, operating to favour the processing of emotionally threatening information. It has been suggested that this processing bias may play a functional role in mediating emotional vulnerability by moderating affective responses to stressful real life events. The current experiment employs a longitudinal design, capable of addressing the central predictions arising from this theoretical position. Thirty-one women awaiting colposcopy investigation were screened on both traditional questionnaire measures of emotional vulnerability, and on a modified emotional Stroop task that provided objective indices of their automatic and strategic patterns of processing selectivity. Subsequently, those 15 women who later received a diagnosis of cervical pathology reported the degree to which this diagnosis had impaired their level of emotional functioning. The results confirm that, at the initial test time, trait anxiety was indeed associated with an apparently automatic tendency to selectively process threat related distractor information. Furthermore, an index of this initial pattern of automatic processing selectivity was consistently the best predictor of the intensity of emotional distress elicited by the subsequent diagnosis of cervical pathology. None of our conventional questionnaire measures were capable of significantly predicting this later emotional response. We suggest that these findings offer empirical support for the hypotheses that patterns of automatic processing selectivity may moderate individuals' emotional responses to stressful life events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1567344     DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(92)90138-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  39 in total

1.  Neuroticism: a non-informative marker of vulnerability to psychopathology.

Authors:  Johan Ormel; Judith Rosmalen; Ann Farmer
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 2.  Fear of cancer recurrence: a theoretical review and novel cognitive processing formulation.

Authors:  Joanna E Fardell; Belinda Thewes; Jane Turner; Jemma Gilchrist; Louise Sharpe; Allan 'Ben' Smith; Afaf Girgis; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation.

Authors:  Andrew J Waters; Saul Shiffman; Michael A Sayette; Jean A Paty; Chad J Gwaltney; Mark H Balabanis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  The default mode network and recurrent depression: a neurobiological model of cognitive risk factors.

Authors:  Igor Marchetti; Ernst H W Koster; Edmund J Sonuga-Barke; Rudi De Raedt
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  A pilot randomized controlled trial of cognitive bias modification to reduce fear of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Wendy G Lichtenthal; Geoffrey W Corner; Elizabeth T Slivjak; Kailey E Roberts; Yuelin Li; William Breitbart; Stephanie Lacey; Malwina Tuman; Katherine N DuHamel; Victoria S Blinder; Courtney Beard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Pooled patient-level meta-analysis of children and adults completing a computer-based anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias.

Authors:  Rebecca B Price; Meredith Wallace; Jennie M Kuckertz; Nader Amir; Simona Graur; Logan Cummings; Paul Popa; Per Carlbring; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-09-20

Review 7.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

8.  Behavioural assays to model cognitive and affective dimensions of depression and anxiety in rats.

Authors:  M D S Lapiz-Bluhm; C O Bondi; J Doyen; G A Rodriguez; T Bédard-Arana; D A Morilak
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.627

9.  Preconscious processing biases predict emotional reactivity to stress.

Authors:  Elaine Fox; Shanna Cahill; Konstantina Zougkou
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Subjective experience of cognitive failures as possible risk factor for negative symptoms of psychosis in the general population.

Authors:  Stefanie Pfeifer; Jim van Os; Manon Hanssen; Philippe Delespaul; Lydia Krabbendam
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.