Literature DB >> 15673438

Factors limiting motor recovery after facial nerve transection in the rat: combined structural and functional analyses.

Orlando Guntinas-Lichius1, Andrey Irintchev, Michael Streppel, Mithra Lenzen, Maria Grosheva, Konstantin Wewetzer, Wolfram F Neiss, Doychin N Angelov.   

Abstract

It is believed that a major reason for the poor functional recovery after peripheral nerve lesion is collateral branching and regrowth of axons to incorrect muscles. Using a facial nerve injury protocol in rats, we previously identified a novel and clinically feasible approach to combat axonal misguidance--the application of neutralizing antibodies against neurotrophic factors to the injured nerve. Here, we investigated whether reduced collateral branching at the lesion site leads to better functional recovery. Treatment of rats with antibodies against nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, fibroblast growth factor, insulin-like neurotrophic factor I, ciliary neurotrophic factor or glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor increased the precision of reinnervation, as evaluated by multiple retrograde labelling of motoneurons, more than two-fold as compared with control animals. However, biometric analysis of vibrissae movements did not show positive effects on functional recovery, suggesting that polyneuronal reinnervation--rather than collateral branching --may be the critical limiting factor. In support of this hypothesis, we found that motor end-plates with morphological signs of multiple innervation were much more frequent in reinnervated muscles of rats that did not recover after injury (51% of all end-plates) than in animals with good functional performance (10%). Because polyneuronal innervation of muscle fibres is activity-dependent and can be manipulated, the present findings raise hopes that clinically feasible and effective therapies could be soon designed and tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15673438     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03877.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  37 in total

1.  [Regeneration of the facial nerve in comparison to other peripheral nerves : from bench to bedside].

Authors:  A Irintchev; D N Angelov; O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Rehabilitation options for lesions of the facial nerve].

Authors:  O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Manual stimulation of forearm muscles does not improve recovery of motor function after injury to a mixed peripheral nerve.

Authors:  N Sinis; O Guntinas-Lichius; A Irintchev; E Skouras; S Kuerten; S P Pavlov; H E Schaller; S A Dunlop; D N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  [Experimental studies for the improvement of facial nerve regeneration].

Authors:  O Guntinas-Lichius; D N Angelov
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  A novel method of head fixation for the study of rodent facial function.

Authors:  Tessa Hadlock; Jeffrey Kowaleski; Susan Mackinnon; James T Heaton
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Polyneuronal innervation of single muscle fibers in cat eye muscle: inferior oblique.

Authors:  Diana M Dimitrova; Brian L Allman; Mary S Shall; Stephen J Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The Dilator Naris Muscle as a Reporter of Facial Nerve Regeneration in a Rat Model.

Authors:  Julie S Weinberg; Ingrid J Kleiss; Christopher J Knox; James T Heaton; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  A system for studying facial nerve function in rats through simultaneous bilateral monitoring of eyelid and whisker movements.

Authors:  James T Heaton; Jeffrey M Kowaleski; Roberto Bermejo; H Philip Zeigler; David J Ahlgren; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Nerve crush but not displacement-induced stretch of the intra-arachnoidal facial nerve promotes facial palsy after cerebellopontine angle surgery.

Authors:  Habib Bendella; Derald E Brackmann; Roland Goldbrunner; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Non-invasive stimulation of the vibrissal pad improves recovery of whisking function after simultaneous lesion of the facial and infraorbital nerves in rats.

Authors:  H Bendella; S P Pavlov; M Grosheva; A Irintchev; S K Angelova; D Merkel; N Sinis; K Kaidoglou; E Skouras; S A Dunlop; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.