OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pain management satisfaction in elderly postoperative patients; to define pain management strategies documented in the medical record (MR) that predict patient satisfaction. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Eight urban hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred twenty-two postsurgical patients aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were surveyed regarding satisfaction with pain management in the first 24 hours postsurgery and the survey results summarized in a score. Pain management variables (patient education, pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions, demographic variables, and surgery and anesthesia information) were abstracted from their MR. The correlation between the satisfaction score and MR variables was assessed using linear regression. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of patients experienced severe postoperative pain, yet 87% reported being satisfied with the treatment. The mean satisfaction score+/-standard deviation was 59.3+/-10.8 (range 10.6-84.3; potential range 0-100, higher score=higher satisfaction). MR variables explained 14% of the satisfaction score variation. The worst pain intensity in the first 24 hours postsurgery as documented in the MR was the most powerful predictor of satisfaction. Other predictors associated with satisfaction were younger age, male sex, preoperative education, surgery type (laparotomy/thoracotomy patients were more satisfied than orthopedic patients), shorter recovery room stay, analgesic given through oral route, and morphine (compared with other opioids). CONCLUSION: Pain in elderly surgical patients remains undermanaged. Simple strategies such as emphasizing preoperative education may have a large effect in pain management. This study developed a validated patient satisfaction score and a MR instrument to assist in monitoring pain management quality.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pain management satisfaction in elderly postoperative patients; to define pain management strategies documented in the medical record (MR) that predict patient satisfaction. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Eight urban hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred twenty-two postsurgical patients aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Patients were surveyed regarding satisfaction with pain management in the first 24 hours postsurgery and the survey results summarized in a score. Pain management variables (patient education, pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions, demographic variables, and surgery and anesthesia information) were abstracted from their MR. The correlation between the satisfaction score and MR variables was assessed using linear regression. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of patients experienced severe postoperative pain, yet 87% reported being satisfied with the treatment. The mean satisfaction score+/-standard deviation was 59.3+/-10.8 (range 10.6-84.3; potential range 0-100, higher score=higher satisfaction). MR variables explained 14% of the satisfaction score variation. The worst pain intensity in the first 24 hours postsurgery as documented in the MR was the most powerful predictor of satisfaction. Other predictors associated with satisfaction were younger age, male sex, preoperative education, surgery type (laparotomy/thoracotomy patients were more satisfied than orthopedic patients), shorter recovery room stay, analgesic given through oral route, and morphine (compared with other opioids). CONCLUSION:Pain in elderly surgical patients remains undermanaged. Simple strategies such as emphasizing preoperative education may have a large effect in pain management. This study developed a validated patient satisfaction score and a MR instrument to assist in monitoring pain management quality.
Authors: R Likar; W Jaksch; T Aigmüller; M Brunner; T Cohnert; J Dieber; W Eisner; S Geyrhofer; G Grögl; F Herbst; R Hetterle; F Javorsky; H G Kress; O Kwasny; S Madersbacher; H Mächler; R Mittermair; J Osterbrink; B Stöckl; M Sulzbacher; B Taxer; B Todoroff; A Tuchmann; A Wicker; A Sandner-Kiesling Journal: Schmerz Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Sandra F Simmons; John F Schnelle; Avantika A Saraf; Chris Simon Coelho; J Mary Lou Jacobsen; Sunil Kripalani; Susan Bell; Amanda Mixon; Eduard E Vasilevskis Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2015-07-16
Authors: Juan C Rodriguez; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Constance H Fung; Stella Jouldjian; Karen R Josephson; Michael N Mitchell; Yeonsu Song; Jennifer L Martin; Cathy A Alessi Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Martin Purdy; Mari Kinnunen; Merja Kokki; Maarit Anttila; Matti Eskelinen; Heidi Hautajärvi; Marko Lehtonen; Hannu Kokki Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Sara Viotti; Claudio Giovanni Cortese; Jacopo Garlasco; Erika Rainero; Ifeoma Nneka Emelurumonye; Stefano Passi; Flavio Boraso; Maria Michela Gianino Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 3.390