David Casarett1, Roxane Crowley, Carolyn Stevenson, Sharon Xie, Joan Teno. 1. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. casarett@mail.med.upenn.edu <casarett@mail.med.upenn.edu>
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To define patients' and families' priorities for information about hospice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interview. SETTING: Urban, not-for-profit, Medicare-certified hospice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and families recruited from consecutive hospice information visits. MEASUREMENTS: Understanding of hospice, assessment of the relative importance of eight categories of information (by direct rating and ranking tasks), and nurse observation of shared decision making between patient and family (5-point scale). RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 237 patients and families at a hospice information visit. Forty percent (n=94) said that they knew anything about hospice. Most often, family members made the enrollment decision (n=132, 57%). Of the eight categories of information, patients and families placed the greatest importance on visit frequency (n=143, 60%), payment for hospice (n=140, 59%), and the practical help that hospice provides (n=123, 52%). Principal component factor analysis reduced the categories to three distinct factors reflecting concerns related to impending death, practical support, and changes from established patterns of care. CONCLUSION: Most patients and families who are referred for a hospice information visit know little about hospice and have substantial information needs. Referring physicians and hospice teams may be able to better support hospice enrollment decisions by anticipating common priorities for information.
OBJECTIVES: To define patients' and families' priorities for information about hospice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interview. SETTING: Urban, not-for-profit, Medicare-certified hospice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and families recruited from consecutive hospice information visits. MEASUREMENTS: Understanding of hospice, assessment of the relative importance of eight categories of information (by direct rating and ranking tasks), and nurse observation of shared decision making between patient and family (5-point scale). RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 237 patients and families at a hospice information visit. Forty percent (n=94) said that they knew anything about hospice. Most often, family members made the enrollment decision (n=132, 57%). Of the eight categories of information, patients and families placed the greatest importance on visit frequency (n=143, 60%), payment for hospice (n=140, 59%), and the practical help that hospice provides (n=123, 52%). Principal component factor analysis reduced the categories to three distinct factors reflecting concerns related to impending death, practical support, and changes from established patterns of care. CONCLUSION: Most patients and families who are referred for a hospice information visit know little about hospice and have substantial information needs. Referring physicians and hospice teams may be able to better support hospice enrollment decisions by anticipating common priorities for information.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Authors: Ariel Shalev; Veerawat Phongtankuel; Elissa Kozlov; Megan Johnson Shen; Ronald D Adelman; M C Reid Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Kei Ouchi; Naomi George; Jeremiah D Schuur; Emily L Aaronson; Charlotta Lindvall; Edward Bernstein; Rebecca L Sudore; Mara A Schonberg; Susan D Block; James A Tulsky Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Katherine A Ornstein; Melissa D Aldridge; Christine A Mair; Rebecca Gorges; Albert L Siu; Amy S Kelley Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 2.947