Literature DB >> 15672596

Characterization of a centromeric marker on mouse chromosome 11 and its introgression in a domesticus/musculus hybrid zone.

Isabelle Lanneluc1, Erick Desmarais, Pierre Boursot, Barbara Dod, François Bonhomme.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that the distribution of Robertsonian chromosome fusions and the Chromosome 11 Nucleolar Organizer Region (NOR) in the Danish hybrid zone between M. m. musculus and M. m. domesticus stems from centromeric incompatibilities between the two subspecies. To test this hypothesis, we identified and characterized a diagnostic subspecific marker closely linked to the centromere on mouse Chromosome 11. Using an allele-specific PCR assay, we investigated the introgression pattern of this centromere in a large sample of mice from a North-South transect of the hybrid zone in Jutland. Domesticus alleles were found to introgress far away from the center of the zone on the musculus side. These results suggest there is no incompatibility between the domesticus centromere of Chromosome 11 in the musculus genomic background.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15672596     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-004-2397-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  32 in total

1.  Rapid chromosomal evolution in island mice.

Authors:  J Britton-Davidian; J Catalan; M da Graça Ramalhinho; G Ganem; J C Auffray; R Capela; M Biscoito; J B Searle; M da Luz Mathias
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Genomic and genetic definition of a functional human centromere.

Authors:  M G Schueler; A W Higgins; M K Rudd; K Gustashaw; H F Willard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Centromeres in the genomic era: unraveling paradoxes.

Authors:  G P Copenhaver; D Preuss
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.834

Review 4.  Conflict begets complexity: the evolution of centromeres.

Authors:  Harmit S Malik; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Ensembl 2002: accommodating comparative genomics.

Authors:  M Clamp; D Andrews; D Barker; P Bevan; G Cameron; Y Chen; L Clark; T Cox; J Cuff; V Curwen; T Down; R Durbin; E Eyras; J Gilbert; M Hammond; T Hubbard; A Kasprzyk; D Keefe; H Lehvaslaiho; V Iyer; C Melsopp; E Mongin; R Pettett; S Potter; A Rust; E Schmidt; S Searle; G Slater; J Smith; W Spooner; A Stabenau; J Stalker; E Stupka; A Ureta-Vidal; I Vastrik; E Birney
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Why is the house mouse karyotype so variable?

Authors:  M W Nachman; J B Searle
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  How cells get the right chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The cenpB gene is not essential in mice.

Authors:  M Kapoor; R Montes de Oca Luna; G Liu; G Lozano; C Cummings; M Mancini; I Ouspenski; B R Brinkley; G S May
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Robertsonian metacentrics of the house mouse lose telomeric sequences but retain some minor satellite DNA in the pericentromeric area.

Authors:  S Garagna; D Broccoli; C A Redi; J B Searle; H J Cooke; E Capanna
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Differences in the organization and chromosomal allocation of satellite DNA between the European long tailed house mice Mus domesticus and Mus musculus.

Authors:  C A Redi; S Garagna; G Della Valle; G Bottiroli; P Dell'Orto; G Viale; F A Peverali; E Raimondi; J Forejt
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evidence of functional Cd94 polymorphism in a free-living house mouse population.

Authors:  Linn E Knutsen; Erik Dissen; Per C Saether; Elisabeth Gyllensten Bjørnsen; Jaroslav Piálek; Anne K Storset; Preben Boysen
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.846

2.  The diverse origins of New Zealand house mice.

Authors:  Jeremy B Searle; Paul M Jamieson; Islam Gündüz; Mark I Stevens; Eleanor P Jones; Chrissen E C Gemmill; Carolyn M King
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Transmission distortion and genetic incompatibilities between alleles in a multigenerational mouse advanced intercross line.

Authors:  Danny Arends; Stefan Kärst; Sebastian Heise; Paula Korkuc; Deike Hesse; Gudrun A Brockmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Molecular and phenotypic distinction of the very recently evolved insular subspecies Mus musculus helgolandicus ZIMMERMANN, 1953.

Authors:  Hiba Babiker; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.260

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.