PURPOSE: To assess the status of EGFR, HER-2, and CCND1 at the gene and protein levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Dual-color FISH assays were performed using DNA probes for EGFR/CEP 7, HER-2/CEP 17, and CCND1/CEP 11. The respective proteins, furthermore, was assessed in IHC assays and correlated with patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: From 55 ESCCs, 8 (15%) tumors showed gene amplification and 20 (36%) had gene overrepresentation (balanced gene and chromosome 7 polysomy) for EGFR. High-level protein expression was frequent (49%), positively correlated with gene copy numbers (kappa=0.4), and associated with well-differentiated histology (p=0.02). For HER-2, gene amplification was detected in a single tumor (2%) and protein overexpression was rare (9%). CCND1 gene was amplified in 23 (42%) tumors; likewise, CCND1 protein overexpression was common (58%) and prevailed in gene overrepresentation or amplification. Only 1 patient showed gene amplification for both EGFR and CCND1. Survival was not associated with EGFR or CCND1 gene/protein status, whereas negative patients for HER-2 protein had a better survival than positive patients (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent overexpression and gene amplification of EGFR and CCND1 make these molecules and their pathways potential therapeutic targets for ESCC. In addition, EGFR and CCND1 appeared to be independently altered suggesting alternative mechanisms for pathway activation. Therapeutic agents targeting these molecules are urged to be tested in clinical trials and comprehensive biological analyses should be included to properly interpret the outcome.
PURPOSE: To assess the status of EGFR, HER-2, and CCND1 at the gene and protein levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Dual-color FISH assays were performed using DNA probes for EGFR/CEP 7, HER-2/CEP 17, and CCND1/CEP 11. The respective proteins, furthermore, was assessed in IHC assays and correlated with patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: From 55 ESCCs, 8 (15%) tumors showed gene amplification and 20 (36%) had gene overrepresentation (balanced gene and chromosome 7 polysomy) for EGFR. High-level protein expression was frequent (49%), positively correlated with gene copy numbers (kappa=0.4), and associated with well-differentiated histology (p=0.02). For HER-2, gene amplification was detected in a single tumor (2%) and protein overexpression was rare (9%). CCND1 gene was amplified in 23 (42%) tumors; likewise, CCND1 protein overexpression was common (58%) and prevailed in gene overrepresentation or amplification. Only 1 patient showed gene amplification for both EGFR and CCND1. Survival was not associated with EGFR or CCND1 gene/protein status, whereas negative patients for HER-2 protein had a better survival than positive patients (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent overexpression and gene amplification of EGFR and CCND1 make these molecules and their pathways potential therapeutic targets for ESCC. In addition, EGFR and CCND1 appeared to be independently altered suggesting alternative mechanisms for pathway activation. Therapeutic agents targeting these molecules are urged to be tested in clinical trials and comprehensive biological analyses should be included to properly interpret the outcome.
Authors: S C Stocks; N Pratt; M Sales; D A Johnston; A M Thompson; F A Carey; N M Kernohan Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: M Torzewski; M Sarbia; P Verreet; F Bittinger; P Dutkowski; H Heep; R Willers; H E Gabbert Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 1997 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Paul A Bunn; Michael V Di Maria; Robert Veve; Roy M Bremmes; Anna E Barón; Chan Zeng; Wilbur A Franklin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W Zhang; R Hong; L Xue; Y Ou; X Liu; Z Zhao; W Xiao; D Dong; L Dong; M Fu; L Ma; N Lu; H Chen; Y Song; Q Zhan Journal: Oncogene Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Aatur D Singhi; Christina A Arnold; Dora M Lam-Himlin; Marina N Nikiforova; Lysandra Voltaggio; Marcia I Canto; Kevin M McGrath; Elizabeth A Montgomery Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Rebecca S Muraoka-Cook; Laura S Caskey; Melissa A Sandahl; Debra M Hunter; Carty Husted; Karen E Strunk; Carolyn I Sartor; William A Rearick; Wesley McCall; Magdalene K Sgagias; Kenneth H Cowan; H Shelton Earp Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Meysam Moghbeli; Mohammad Reza Abbaszadegan; Moein Farshchian; Mehdi Montazer; Reza Raeisossadati; Abbas Abdollahi; Mohammad Mahdi Forghanifard Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Marilanda F Bellini; Antonio J Manzato; Ana E Silva; Marileila Varella-Garcia Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Serena S Freeman; Steven W Allen; Ramapriya Ganti; Jianrong Wu; Jing Ma; Xiaoping Su; Geoff Neale; Jeffrey S Dome; Najat C Daw; Joseph D Khoury Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860