Literature DB >> 15672008

Nuchal translucency and fetal cardiac defects: a pooled analysis of major fetal echocardiography centers.

George Makrydimas1, Alexandros Sotiriadis, Ian C Huggon, John Simpson, Gurleen Sharland, Julene S Carvalho, Piers E Daubeney, John P A Ioannidis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Increased fetal nuchal translucency is associated with increased risk for congenital heart defects. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether fetal nuchal translucency distribution differs among different types of congenital heart defects and whether it can lead to an earlier diagnosis. STUDY
DESIGN: Four fetal echocardiography units provided data on fetuses with a congenital heart defect diagnosis in whom nuchal translucency thickness had been measured in the first trimester. Nuchal translucency data were compared per chromosomal status and type of congenital heart defect. Data on gestational age at diagnosis were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-seven cases of congenital heart defect with known karyotype and exact nuchal translucency measurements were analyzed. Nuchal translucency was > or =3.5 mm in 22.9% of chromosomally normal fetuses (n = 397) and 58.8% of chromosomally abnormal cases (n = 240). Among fetuses with normal karyotype, the proportion of cases of congenital heart defect with increased nuchal translucency was similar in each of the subtypes of congenital heart defect (P = .96). Mean gestational age at diagnosis of congenital heart defect in fetuses with normal karyotype was 22.1 weeks with nuchal translucency of <3.5 mm and 16.1 weeks with nuchal translucency of > or =3.5 mm.
CONCLUSION: Finding nuchal translucency of > or =3.5 mm may lead to an earlier diagnosis of all major types of congenital heart defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15672008     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice: does it help?

Authors:  Luís F Gonçalves; Wesley Lee; Jimmy Espinoza; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Impact of fetal echocardiography.

Authors:  John M Simpson
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-01

Review 3.  Prenatal screening for structural congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Lindsey E Hunter; John M Simpson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Diagnostic value of echocardiography in fetal cardiac malformation and clinical classification.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Jianning Li; Juan Yin
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Simplified protocol of nuchal translucency measurement: Is it still effective?

Authors:  Sun Min Kim; Jong Kwan Jun
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2013-09-14

6.  First trimester diagnosis and screening for fetal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Deborah A Driscoll; Susan J Gross
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  A new model for providing cell-free DNA and risk assessment for chromosome abnormalities in a public hospital setting.

Authors:  Robert Wallerstein; Andrea Jelks; Matthew J Garabedian
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2014-07-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.