BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular (AV) delay optimization may be important in patients with biventricular pacing and the optimal AV delay can be predicted using Doppler echocardiography and the formula: optimal AV delay = AV delay-the interval between the end of A wave and complete closure of the mitral valve when the AV delay is set at slightly prolonged AV delay. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the present study the efficacy of this method was evaluated in 5 patients (67.4+/-8.0 (SD) years old) with biventricular pacing. Cardiac output (CO) and diastolic filling time were measured by Doppler echocardiography. When the AV delay was set at the predicted optimal AV delay -25 ms, the predicted optimal AV delay (133+/-66 ms) and predicted optimal AV delay + 25 ms, the respective CO were 4.5+/-0.9, 5.3+/-1.0, 4.8+/-1.0 L/min (p<0.05, ANOVA) and the diastolic filling times were 364 +/-100, 373+/-105, 335+/-84 ms (p<0.05, ANOVA). Congestive heart failure improved from New York Heart Association class 3.6+/-0.5 to 1.4+/-0.5 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AV delay optimization is important in patients with biventricular pacing and can be easily achieved by the new method.
BACKGROUND:Atrioventricular (AV) delay optimization may be important in patients with biventricular pacing and the optimal AV delay can be predicted using Doppler echocardiography and the formula: optimal AV delay = AV delay-the interval between the end of A wave and complete closure of the mitral valve when the AV delay is set at slightly prolonged AV delay. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the present study the efficacy of this method was evaluated in 5 patients (67.4+/-8.0 (SD) years old) with biventricular pacing. Cardiac output (CO) and diastolic filling time were measured by Doppler echocardiography. When the AV delay was set at the predicted optimal AV delay -25 ms, the predicted optimal AV delay (133+/-66 ms) and predicted optimal AV delay + 25 ms, the respective CO were 4.5+/-0.9, 5.3+/-1.0, 4.8+/-1.0 L/min (p<0.05, ANOVA) and the diastolic filling times were 364 +/-100, 373+/-105, 335+/-84 ms (p<0.05, ANOVA). Congestive heart failure improved from New York Heart Association class 3.6+/-0.5 to 1.4+/-0.5 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AV delay optimization is important in patients with biventricular pacing and can be easily achieved by the new method.
Authors: Kenneth M Stein; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Michael R Gold; Bernd Lemke; Ignacio Fernández Lozano; Suneet Mittal; Francis G Spinale; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Alan D Waggoner; Timothy E Meyer Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2009-10-10 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Daniel Y Wang; Lauren A Kelly; Marc E Richmond; T Alexander Quinn; Bin Cheng; Michelle D Spotnitz; Santos E Cabreriza; Yoshifumi Naka; Allan S Stewart; Craig R Smith; Henry M Spotnitz Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2013
Authors: Josep Brugada; Peter Paul Delnoy; Johannes Brachmann; Dwight Reynolds; Luigi Padeletti; Georg Noelker; Charan Kantipudi; José Manuel Rubin Lopez; Wolfgang Dichtl; Alberto Borri-Brunetto; Luc Verhees; Philippe Ritter; Jagmeet P Singh Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 29.983