Literature DB >> 1567133

The influence of suturing and sepsis on the development of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.

D P O'Leary1, J B Coakley.   

Abstract

Postoperative peritoneal adhesions are a major cause of morbidity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential contributions of suturing and sepsis to their formation in animals undergoing laparotomy. Suturing the peritoneum with plain catgut was associated with a high incidence of adhesions to the wound at 8 days (11/15), but this was significantly less at 25 days (5/15, P less than 0.04). Use of monofilament nylon, or non-suture, were each associated with a low incidence of adhesions. Wound strength was significantly greater at 25 days than at 8 days (P less than 0.0005), but did not differ between groups. In a separate experiment, bacterial infection, even in the absence of a particulate carrier, proved to be a potent cause of postoperative peritoneal adhesions (8/9, P = 0.02) compared with uninfected controls (3/10). Suturing the peritoneum in the presence of infection caused an especially high incidence of adhesions to the wound (8/9, P = 0.004 vs 2/10 unsutured). It is concluded that the lowest incidence of adhesions to the wound is likely to be obtained, both in uninfected and in infected cases, if the peritoneum is not sutured during closure of abdominal wounds, and that such an approach does not compromise wound strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1567133      PMCID: PMC2497540     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  14 in total

1.  The aetiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions. An experimental study.

Authors:  H ELLIS
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem?

Authors:  D Menzies; H Ellis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Evaluation of peritoneal closure at laparotomy.

Authors:  M L Kapur; A Daneswar; P Chopra
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  The cause and prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1971-09

5.  Layered and mass closure of the abdominal wall. A theoretical and experimental analysis.

Authors:  H A Dudley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Causes of abdominal adhesions in cases of intestinal obstruction.

Authors:  L E Räf
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1969

7.  Critical operative management of small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  R H Stewardson; C T Bombeck; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Does the peritoneum need to be closed at laparotomy?

Authors:  H Ellis; R Heddle
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Intraperitoneal antiseptics in experimental bacterial peritonitis.

Authors:  J Platt; R A Jones; R A Bucknall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Antiseptics in the treatment of bacterial peritonitis in rats.

Authors:  D J McAvinchey; P T McCollum; N G McElearney; G Mundinger; G Lynch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  11 in total

1.  The influence of intraoperative complications on adhesion formation during laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy in an animal model.

Authors:  E M Gamal; P Metzger; G Szabó; E Bráth; K Petõ; A Oláh; J Kiss; I Furka; I Mikó
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.

Authors:  Willy Arung; Michel Meurisse; Olivier Detry
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Retrograde migration of starch in the genital tract of rabbits.

Authors:  G A Edelstam; A C Sjösten; H Ellis
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 4.  Postoperative Abdominal Adhesions: Clinical Significance and Advances in Prevention and Management.

Authors:  Demetrios Moris; Jeffery Chakedis; Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Ana Wilson; Mairead Marion Hennessy; Antonios Athanasiou; Eliza W Beal; Chrysoula Argyrou; Evangelos Felekouras; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Abdominal adhesions in laparoscopic hernia repair. An experimental study.

Authors:  R Eller; C Twaddell; E Poulos; E Jenevein; D McIntire; S Russell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Influence of small intestinal serosal defect closure on leakage rate and adhesion formation: a pilot study using rabbit models.

Authors:  Marcel Binnebösel; Christian D Klink; Jochen Grommes; Marc Jansen; Ulf P Neumann; Karsten Junge
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Local tissue ischemia is not necessary for suture-induced adhesion formation.

Authors:  Taufiek Konrad Rajab; Christoph Brochhausen; Markus Wallwiener
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  General surgeons' attitudes to the treatment and prevention of abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  D M Scott-Coombes; M N Vipond; J N Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Fibrinolysis in the peritoneal fluid during adhesions, endometriosis and ongoing pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  G Edelstam; I Lecander; B Larsson; B Astedt
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.092

10.  The fate of retained gallstones following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a prairie dog model.

Authors:  J P Bonar; M W Bowyer; D R Welling; K Hirsch
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.