Literature DB >> 15671315

The Clinical Health Economics System Simulation (CHESS): a teaching tool for systems- and practice-based learning.

John D Voss1, Mohan M Nadkarni, Joel M Schectman.   

Abstract

Academic medical centers face barriers to training physicians in systems- and practice-based learning competencies needed to function in the changing health care environment. To address these problems, at the University of Virginia School of Medicine the authors developed the Clinical Health Economics System Simulation (CHESS), a computerized team-based quasi-competitive simulator to teach the principles and practical application of health economics. CHESS simulates treatment costs to patients and society as well as physician reimbursement. It is scenario based with residents grouped into three teams, each team playing CHESS using differing (fee-for-service or capitated) reimbursement models. Teams view scenarios and select from two or three treatment options that are medically justifiable yet have different potential cost implications. CHESS displays physician reimbursement and patient and societal costs for each scenario as well as costs and income summarized across all scenarios extrapolated to a physician's entire patient panel. The learners are asked to explain these findings and may change treatment options and other variables such as panel size and case mix to conduct sensitivity analyses in real time. Evaluations completed in 2003 by 68 (94%) CHESS resident and faculty participants at 19 U.S. residency programs preferred CHESS to a traditional lecture-and-discussion format to learn about medical decision making, physician reimbursement, patient costs, and societal costs. Ninety-eight percent reported increased knowledge of health economics after viewing the simulation. CHESS demonstrates the potential of computer simulation to teach health economics and other key elements of practice- and systems-based competencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15671315     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200502000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  5 in total

1.  Teaching Wisely.

Authors:  Adam J Obley; Katherine A Iossi; Linda L Humphrey
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-09

2.  Use of multidisciplinary rounds to simultaneously improve quality outcomes, enhance resident education, and shorten length of stay.

Authors:  Stephen O'Mahony; Eric Mazur; Pamela Charney; Yun Wang; Jonathan Fine
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Examining patterns in medication documentation of trade and generic names in an academic family practice training centre.

Authors:  Alexander Summers; Carly Ruderman; Fok-Han Leung; Morgan Slater
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Development of a Web-based resident profiling tool to support training in practice-based learning and improvement.

Authors:  Jason A Lyman; John Schorling; Mohan Nadkarni; Natalie May; Ken Scully; John Voss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A pilot study of a practice management training module for medical residents.

Authors:  Lizanne Berkenbosch; Arno M M Muijtjens; Luc J I Zimmermann; Ide C Heyligers; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Jamiu O Busari
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.