PURPOSE: To determine the effects of solute molecular weight and lipophilicity on the permeability of a retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-choroid preparation. METHODS: Fresh RPE-choroid specimens from bovine eyes were placed in diffusion chambers for permeability experiments with carboxyfluorescein, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled dextrans with molecular masses from 4 to 80 kDa, and beta-blockers exhibiting a wide range of lipophilicity (atenolol, nadolol, pindolol, timolol, metoprolol, and betaxolol). Permeability experiments were performed both in the choroid-to-retina (inward) direction and in the retina-to-choroid (outward) direction. Carboxyfluorescein and FITC-dextrans were determined by fluorometry, and beta-blockers by HPLC. The transepithelial electrical resistance and potential difference were monitored during the experiments. RESULTS: Permeability of the fluorescent FITC-dextran probes through RPE-choroid decreased significantly with the increasing size of the probe. RPE-choroid was 35 times more permeable to carboxyfluorescein (376 Da) than to FITC-dextran 80 kDa. The permeabilities of lipophilic beta-blockers were up to 8 and 20 times higher than that of hydrophilic atenolol and carboxyfluorescein, respectively. The lag time of solute flux across the RPE-choroid increased with the molecular weight and lipophilicity. Compared with published data on isolated sclera, bovine RPE-choroid was 10 to 100 times less permeable to hydrophilic compounds and macromolecules. The permeability of lipophilic molecules in RPE-choroid was in the same range as in the sclera. CONCLUSIONS: RPE is a major barrier and may be the rate-limiting factor in the retinal delivery of hydrophilic drugs and macromolecules through the transscleral route. For lipophilic molecules, RPE-choroid, and sclera are approximately equal barriers.
PURPOSE: To determine the effects of solute molecular weight and lipophilicity on the permeability of a retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-choroid preparation. METHODS: Fresh RPE-choroid specimens from bovine eyes were placed in diffusion chambers for permeability experiments with carboxyfluorescein, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled dextrans with molecular masses from 4 to 80 kDa, and beta-blockers exhibiting a wide range of lipophilicity (atenolol, nadolol, pindolol, timolol, metoprolol, and betaxolol). Permeability experiments were performed both in the choroid-to-retina (inward) direction and in the retina-to-choroid (outward) direction. Carboxyfluorescein and FITC-dextrans were determined by fluorometry, and beta-blockers by HPLC. The transepithelial electrical resistance and potential difference were monitored during the experiments. RESULTS: Permeability of the fluorescent FITC-dextran probes through RPE-choroid decreased significantly with the increasing size of the probe. RPE-choroid was 35 times more permeable to carboxyfluorescein (376 Da) than to FITC-dextran 80 kDa. The permeabilities of lipophilic beta-blockers were up to 8 and 20 times higher than that of hydrophilic atenolol and carboxyfluorescein, respectively. The lag time of solute flux across the RPE-choroid increased with the molecular weight and lipophilicity. Compared with published data on isolated sclera, bovine RPE-choroid was 10 to 100 times less permeable to hydrophilic compounds and macromolecules. The permeability of lipophilic molecules in RPE-choroid was in the same range as in the sclera. CONCLUSIONS: RPE is a major barrier and may be the rate-limiting factor in the retinal delivery of hydrophilic drugs and macromolecules through the transscleral route. For lipophilic molecules, RPE-choroid, and sclera are approximately equal barriers.
Authors: Henry F Edelhauser; Cheryl L Rowe-Rendleman; Michael R Robinson; Daniel G Dawson; Gerald J Chader; Hans E Grossniklaus; Kay D Rittenhouse; Clive G Wilson; David A Weber; Baruch D Kuppermann; Karl G Csaky; Timothy W Olsen; Uday B Kompella; V Michael Holers; Gregory S Hageman; Brian C Gilger; Peter A Campochiaro; Scott M Whitcup; Wai T Wong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rajendra S Kadam; Narayan P S Cheruvu; Henry F Edelhauser; Uday B Kompella Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marko Lamminsalo; Ella Taskinen; Timo Karvinen; Astrid Subrizi; Lasse Murtomäki; Arto Urtti; Veli-Pekka Ranta Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Timothy W Olsen; Xiao Feng; Kathy Wabner; Karl Csaky; Stefan Pambuccian; J Douglas Cameron Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799