Literature DB >> 15670876

Feeling bad about immunising our children.

Abigail L Wroe1, Angela Bhan, Paul Salkovskis, Helen Bedford.   

Abstract

Uptake of MMR vaccinations is as low as 60% in some parts of the UK. This poses a serious public health issue. This longitudinal study investigates parental decisions about MMR and single vaccinations. Parents (n=114) rated their perceptions of the benefits and risks of immunisation, and emotion-related variables; and were followed up to ask their final immunisation decision. Analyses demonstrated that parental decisions were explained by emotion-related variables, specifically anticipated responsibility and regret. It was concluded that parents' decisions about MMR are strongly influenced by the idea than harm that occurs as a result of deciding to immunise (commission) is less acceptable than harm that occurs as a result of deciding not to immunise (omission) (known as 'omission bias').

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15670876     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  9 in total

1.  Sick individuals and sick populations: 20 years later.

Authors:  Y G Doyle; A Furey; J Flowers
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Addressing personal parental values in decisions about childhood vaccination: Measure development.

Authors:  Jessica R Cataldi; Carter Sevick; Jennifer Pyrzanowski; Nicole Wagner; Sarah E Brewer; Komal J Narwaney; Jo Ann Shoup; Ken Resnicow; Jason Glanz; Amanda Dempsey; Bethany M Kwan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  A matter of perspective: choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Brianna Sarr; Angela Fagerlin; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Cost effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for parents deciding about MMR vaccination: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  Sandy Tubeuf; Richard Edlin; Swati Shourie; Francine M Cheater; Hilary Bekker; Cath Jackson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  How do Midwives and Physicians Discuss Childhood Vaccination with Parents?

Authors:  Eve Dubé; Maryline Vivion; Chantal Sauvageau; Arnaud Gagneur; Raymonde Gagnon; Maryse Guay
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  A cluster randomised controlled trial of a web based decision aid to support parents' decisions about their child's Measles Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccination.

Authors:  S Shourie; C Jackson; F M Cheater; H L Bekker; R Edlin; S Tubeuf; W Harrison; E McAleese; M Schweiger; B Bleasby; L Hammond
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Parental attitudes towards measles vaccination in the canton of Aargau, Switzerland: a latent class analysis.

Authors:  Carine Weiss; Daniel Schröpfer; Sonja Merten
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  The attitudes of owners and veterinary professionals in the United Kingdom to the risk of adverse events associated with using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to treat dogs with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Zoe Belshaw; Lucy Asher; Rachel S Dean
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  Facts Tell, Stories Sell? Assessing the Availability Heuristic and Resistance as Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying the Persuasive Effects of Vaccination Narratives.

Authors:  Lisa Vandeberg; Corine S Meppelink; José Sanders; Marieke L Fransen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.