OBJECTIVE: Despite improvements in imaging techniques, histopathological diagnosis is still an important tool in neuro-oncology. At Freiburg University Hospital in Germany, approximately 450 patients per year undergo a serial stereotactic biopsy to obtain a diagnosis. We analyzed the accuracy of intraoperative diagnosis for rapid establishment of treatment options. Furthermore, we wanted to find out whether the location and histopathology of the tumors as well as the age and sex of the patients affected accuracy. Because of the large number of biopsies performed per year, parameters could also be evaluated for rare cerebral lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 5000 consecutive stereotactic brain biopsies from 4589 patients. The digital database comprises the intraoperative and final diagnoses, the location of the tumors, and the sex and age of the patients. Regression analysis was performed to identify parameters that had a significant impact on the results. RESULTS: Intraoperative diagnosis was correct in 90.3% of biopsies. This included complete correlation in 81.3% of the biopsies and partial correlation in 9% of the biopsies. In 5.1% of the biopsies, no correlation between the intraoperative and final diagnosis was obtained. In 4.6% of the biopsies, no diagnosis could be made during or after surgery. A high correlation was found for World Health Organization Type II astrocytomas and, with regression analysis, for World Health Organization Type I astrocytomas, glioblastomas, and metastases. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative diagnosis with stereotactic biopsy has high validity. Immediate treatment based on the intraoperative diagnosis can be justified (e.g., for metastases or glioblastomas). Stereotactic biopsy with an exact histopathological diagnosis is strongly recommended for planning adequate therapy for patients with unidentified brain lesions.
OBJECTIVE: Despite improvements in imaging techniques, histopathological diagnosis is still an important tool in neuro-oncology. At Freiburg University Hospital in Germany, approximately 450 patients per year undergo a serial stereotactic biopsy to obtain a diagnosis. We analyzed the accuracy of intraoperative diagnosis for rapid establishment of treatment options. Furthermore, we wanted to find out whether the location and histopathology of the tumors as well as the age and sex of the patients affected accuracy. Because of the large number of biopsies performed per year, parameters could also be evaluated for rare cerebral lesions. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 5000 consecutive stereotactic brain biopsies from 4589 patients. The digital database comprises the intraoperative and final diagnoses, the location of the tumors, and the sex and age of the patients. Regression analysis was performed to identify parameters that had a significant impact on the results. RESULTS: Intraoperative diagnosis was correct in 90.3% of biopsies. This included complete correlation in 81.3% of the biopsies and partial correlation in 9% of the biopsies. In 5.1% of the biopsies, no correlation between the intraoperative and final diagnosis was obtained. In 4.6% of the biopsies, no diagnosis could be made during or after surgery. A high correlation was found for World Health Organization Type II astrocytomas and, with regression analysis, for World Health Organization Type I astrocytomas, glioblastomas, and metastases. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative diagnosis with stereotactic biopsy has high validity. Immediate treatment based on the intraoperative diagnosis can be justified (e.g., for metastases or glioblastomas). Stereotactic biopsy with an exact histopathological diagnosis is strongly recommended for planning adequate therapy for patients with unidentified brain lesions.
Authors: Georg Widhalm; Georgi Minchev; Adelheid Woehrer; Matthias Preusser; Barbara Kiesel; Julia Furtner; Aygül Mert; Antonio Di Ieva; Boguslaw Tomanek; Daniela Prayer; Christine Marosi; Johannes A Hainfellner; Engelbert Knosp; Stefan Wolfsberger Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2012-03-10 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: G Lai; A Mahadevan; D Hackney; P C Warnke; F Nigim; E Kasper; E T Wong; B S Carter; C C Chen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ruben Dammers; Joost W Schouten; Iain K Haitsma; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Johan M Kros; Clemens M F Dirven Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 2.216