Literature DB >> 15670263

Does the nutrient drink test accurately predict postprandial gastric volume in health and community dyspepsia?

J Gonenne1, E J Castillo, M Camilleri, D Burton, G M Thomforde, K L Baxter, A R Zinsmeister.   

Abstract

Nutrient drink tests have been proposed as a surrogate for measurement of gastric accommodation. To study the relationship of maximum tolerated volume (MTV) during nutrient drink test and gastric volumes measured by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in healthy controls and functional dyspepsia (FD) patients. We reviewed data from 85 healthy controls and 35 FD residents of south-eastern Minnesota. All underwent standardized nutrient drink and SPECT studies between August 2000 and June 2003. To test for associations between nutrient drink test and SPECT gastric volumes, we used multiple linear regression and partial regression analyses, assigning age, gender, dyspepsia status and postprandial symptoms as covariates in the model. In the combined group (healthy and FD), MTV was weakly associated with fasting gastric volume (r = 0.43, P = 0.0001) and with volume response to feeding (r = 0.25, P = 0.006). In the FD group, associations were similar (fasting r = 0.53, P = 0.001; postmeal r = 0.32, P = 0.06). After accounting for covariates, MTV only explained 13 and 3% of variations in fasting and postprandial volumes measured by SPECT. MTV during the nutrient drink test does not accurately reflect gastric volume measurements by SPECT in healthy controls and a sample of people in the community with FD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15670263     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2004.00588.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  8 in total

Review 1.  Satiety testing: ready for the clinic?

Authors:  Michael P Jones
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Impaired gastric accommodation and its role in dyspepsia.

Authors:  S Kindt; J Tack
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Pathogenesis and therapy for idiopathic dyspepsia.

Authors:  Jan Tack; Sébastien Kindt
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-12

4.  How to interpret nutrition drink test.

Authors:  Moo In Park
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.924

5.  Applying novel nutrient drink to clinical trial of functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Lim; Myung-Gyu Choi; Myong Ki Baeg; Sung Jin Moon; Jin Su Kim; Yu Kyung Cho; Jae Myung Park; In Seok Lee; Sang Woo Kim; Kyu Yong Choi
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 6.  Insights into the evaluation and management of dyspepsia: recent developments and new guidelines.

Authors:  Christopher J Black; Lesley A Houghton; Alexander C Ford
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.409

7.  How to interpret a functional or motility test - slow nutrient drinking test.

Authors:  Akihito Iida; Hiroshi Kaneko; Toshihiro Konagaya; Kunio Kasugai
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.924

8.  Lack of relationship between chronic upper abdominal symptoms and gastric function in functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Niels van Lelyveld; Maria Schipper; Melvin Samsom
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.