Literature DB >> 15670078

Computerized corneal topography in a paediatric population with Down syndrome.

Andrea L Vincent1, Brent A Weiser, Monique Cupryn, Raymond M Stein, Mohamed Abdolell, Alex V Levin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize abnormal corneal topographic changes using corneal computerized videokeratography (CVK) in a paediatric population with Down syndrome, and in their parents.
METHODS: Prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. Twenty-one children with Down syndrome (mean age 6.9 years) recruited from The Hospital for Sick Children, 18 of their parents, and a paediatric control group of 60 otherwise well children (mean age 9 years), underwent complete ocular examination and CVK using the EyeSys system. Corneal topographic maps were assessed subjectively, and three objective parameters analysed: central corneal power (CP), difference in central corneal power between the two eyes (DCP), and inferior-superior steepening asymmetry (I-S).
RESULTS: Corneal curvature in children with Down syndrome was significantly steeper than in the paediatric control population (CP 46.66 vs 42.60 D, P <0.0001), but changes with age paralleled that of the control population. DCP and I-S values were also significantly different from the control population (P <0.0001). 39% of the parents of children with Down syndrome had at least one abnormal parameter.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that CVK is a useful tool in the ocular assessment of patients with Down syndrome. The findings suggest that this patient population have abnormalities of corneal shape even in the absence of clinical evidence of keratoconus. A greater than expected incidence of abnormal topographic changes was observed in the parents of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15670078     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.00941.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Whole Eye versus First-Surface Astigmatism in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Rachel Knowlton; Jason D Marsack; Norman E Leach; Ralph J Herring; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Simulated Keratometry Repeatability in Subjects with and without Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Ciliary muscle thickness in adults with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Melissa D Bailey; Ruth E Manny; Chiu-Yen Kao
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.992

4.  Visual Acuity Outcomes in a Randomized Trial of Wavefront Metric-optimized Refractions in Adults with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Jason D Marsack; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Karen D Fern
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.106

Review 5.  Genetics of keratoconus: where do we stand?

Authors:  Khaled K Abu-Amero; Abdulrahman M Al-Muammar; Altaf A Kondkar
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Performing corneal crosslinking under local anaesthesia in patients with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Nienke Soeters; Esmée Bennen; Robert P L Wisse
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 7.  Prevalence of keratoconus in persons with Down syndrome: a review.

Authors:  Olav Kristianslund; Liv Drolsum
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.