Literature DB >> 15669956

Pollen and sperm heteromorphism: convergence across kingdoms?

I Till-Bottraud1, D Joly, D Lachaise, R R Snook.   

Abstract

Sperm competition theory predicts that males should produce many, similar sperm. However, in some species of animals and plants, males exhibit a heteromorphism that results in the production of at least two different types of sperm or pollen grains. In animals, sperm heteromorphism typically corresponds to the production of one fertile morph and one (or more) sterile morph(s), whereas in plants two or more pollen morphs (one of which can be either sterile or fertile) are produced in all flowers but sometimes in different anthers. Heteromorphism has arisen independently several times across phyla and at different phylogenetic levels. Here, we compare and contrast sperm and pollen heteromorphism and discuss the evolutionary hypotheses suggested to explain heteromorphism in these taxa. These hypotheses include facilitation, nutritive contribution, blocking, cheap filler, sperm flushing or killing for animals; outcrossing and precise cross-pollen transfer or bet-hedging strategy for plants; cryptic female choice for both. We conclude that heteromorphism in the two phyla is most likely linked to a general evolutionary response to sexual selection, either to increase one male's sperm or pollen success in competition with other males, or mediate male/female interactions. Therefore, although sperm and pollen are not homologous, we suggest that heteromorphism represents an example of convergence across kingdoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15669956     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00789.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  15 in total

1.  Pollen heteromorphism in Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer (Araliaceae) anthers.

Authors:  G D Reunova; A A Reunov; Ya N Aleksandrova; T I Muzarok; Yu N Zhuravlev
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

2.  Sperm length is not influenced by haploid gene expression in the flies Drosophila melanogaster and Scathophaga stercoraria.

Authors:  Scott Pitnick; Ralph Dobler; David J Hosken
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Conceptual developments in sperm competition: a very brief synopsis.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Seminal fluid and accessory male investment in sperm competition.

Authors:  Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Post-ejaculatory modifications to sperm (PEMS).

Authors:  Scott Pitnick; Mariana F Wolfner; Steve Dorus
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2019-11-18

6.  Learning to get along despite struggling to get by.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ostrowski; Gad Shaulsky
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Sperm competition promotes diversity of sperm bundles in Ohomopterus ground beetles.

Authors:  Yasuoki Takami; Teiji Sota
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-02-23

8.  Integrated and independent evolution of heteromorphic sperm types.

Authors:  Allen J Moore; Leonardo D Bacigalupe; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Nuptial gifts fail to resolve a sexual conflict in an insect.

Authors:  Nina Wedell; Tom Tregenza; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Sperm sociality: cooperation, altruism, and spite.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Kevin R Foster
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.