Richard N Jones1, Stephanie J Fonda. 1. Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged Research and Training Institute, Boston, MA 02131, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to calibrate depressive symptoms collected using different versions of the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) instrument in different waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). METHOD: The HRS is a prospective and nationally representative cohort study. This analysis included a sample of HRS participants, adults aged 23-85 years in 1992 who had complete data on depressive symptoms at initial 2- and 4-year follow-up interviews (N= 5,734). Depressive symptoms were assessed with the CES-D. Symptom coverage and response categories varied across study wave. The first wave (1992) used a four-category response, whereas subsequent waves (1994 and 1996) used a two-category response. A structural equations model (SEM) based in Item Response Theory (IRT) was used to calibrate symptoms and generate linked depressive symptom burden scores. RESULTS: Linked depressive symptom burden scores, derived from calibrated symptoms, were distributed similarly across HRS wave. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the applicability of an IRT-based SEM to address a common challenge in prospective studies: changes in the content and context of symptom assessment. Future investigations may make use of our linked syndrome scores to further explore other aspects of depression from a longitudinal perspective.
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to calibrate depressive symptoms collected using different versions of the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression (CES-D) instrument in different waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). METHOD: The HRS is a prospective and nationally representative cohort study. This analysis included a sample of HRSparticipants, adults aged 23-85 years in 1992 who had complete data on depressive symptoms at initial 2- and 4-year follow-up interviews (N= 5,734). Depressive symptoms were assessed with the CES-D. Symptom coverage and response categories varied across study wave. The first wave (1992) used a four-category response, whereas subsequent waves (1994 and 1996) used a two-category response. A structural equations model (SEM) based in Item Response Theory (IRT) was used to calibrate symptoms and generate linked depressive symptom burden scores. RESULTS: Linked depressive symptom burden scores, derived from calibrated symptoms, were distributed similarly across HRS wave. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the applicability of an IRT-based SEM to address a common challenge in prospective studies: changes in the content and context of symptom assessment. Future investigations may make use of our linked syndrome scores to further explore other aspects of depression from a longitudinal perspective.
Authors: H Christensen; A F Jorm; A J Mackinnon; A E Korten; P A Jacomb; A S Henderson; B Rodgers Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Kathleen Suzanne Johnson Preston; Allen W Gottfried; Jonathan J Park; Patrick Don Manapat; Adele Eskeles Gottfried; Pamella H Oliver Journal: Educ Psychol Meas Date: 2017-02-05 Impact factor: 2.821
Authors: Beth E Snitz; Lan Yu; Paul K Crane; Chung-Chou H Chang; Tiffany F Hughes; Mary Ganguli Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2012 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Alden L Gross; Richard N Jones; Tamara G Fong; Douglas Tommet; Sharon K Inouye Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: William T Gallo; Elizabeth H Bradley; Joel A Dubin; Richard N Jones; Tracy A Falba; Hsun-Mei Teng; Stanislav V Kasl Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Jenny E Ostergren; Steven G Heeringa; Carlos F Mendes de Leon; Cathleen M Connell; J Scott Roberts Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: William T Gallo; Elizabeth H Bradley; Hsun-Mei Teng; Stanislav V Kasl Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Margaret Gatz; Chandra A Reynolds; Deborah Finkel; Chris J Hahn; Yan Zhou; Catalina Zavala Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: Alden L Gross; Dan M Mungas; Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons; Anna MacKay-Brandt; Jennifer J Manly; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Heather Romero; Bonnie Sachs; Michael Thomas; Guy G Potter; Richard N Jones Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2015-11-02