Literature DB >> 15669600

Differences between low and high trait impulsivity are not associated with differences in inhibitory motor control.

M Lijffijt1, E M Bekker, E H Quik, J Bakker, J L Kenemans, M N Verbaten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigates whether there is an association between trait impulsivity in the normal population and inhibitory motor control as assessed by the stop task.
METHOD: Low- and high-impulsive participants (as assessed by the I7 questionnaire; both groups n = 31) performed the stop task. Differences in performance were analyzed by an independent samples t-test. Furthermore, a short meta-analysis was performed on this study and three previous studies with a similar aim.
RESULTS: The low- and high-impulsive groups did not differ on the speed to stop the response (SSRT). However, the meta-analysis revealed that high-impulsives are marginally slower in stopping than low-impulsives (effect size = -0.26, p= 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: There is only minor evidence that impulsivity inthe common population is associated with poor inhibitory motor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15669600     DOI: 10.1177/108705470400800104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atten Disord        ISSN: 1087-0547            Impact factor:   3.256


  16 in total

1.  Relationships between trait impulsivity and cognitive control: the effect of attention switching on response inhibition and conflict resolution.

Authors:  Rotem Leshem
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-06

2.  Examining the link between reward and response inhibition in individuals with substance abuse tendencies.

Authors:  Kaileigh A Byrne; Darrell A Worthy
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Deficient inhibition in alcohol-dependence: let's consider the role of the motor system!

Authors:  Caroline Quoilin; Emmanuelle Wilhelm; Pierre Maurage; Philippe de Timary; Julie Duque
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Evaluation of genetic variability in the dopamine receptor D2 in relation to behavioral inhibition and impulsivity/sensation seeking: an exploratory study with d-amphetamine in healthy participants.

Authors:  Ajna Hamidovic; Andrea Dlugos; Andrew Skol; Abraham A Palmer; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Decreased saliency processing as a neural measure of Barratt impulsivity in healthy adults.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Sien Hu; Sheng Zhang; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Integrating impairments in reaction time and executive function using a diffusion model framework.

Authors:  Sarah L Karalunas; Cynthia L Huang-Pollock
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-07

7.  Temporal cascade of frontal, motor and muscle processes underlying human action-stopping.

Authors:  Sumitash Jana; Ricci Hannah; Vignesh Muralidharan; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Delta, theta, and alpha event-related oscillations in alcoholics during Go/NoGo task: Neurocognitive deficits in execution, inhibition, and attention processing.

Authors:  Ashwini K Pandey; Chella Kamarajan; Niklas Manz; David B Chorlian; Arthur Stimus; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 5.067

9.  Methylphenidate improves response inhibition but not reflection-impulsivity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Elise E DeVito; Andrew D Blackwell; Luke Clark; Lindsey Kent; Anna Maria Dezsery; Danielle C Turner; Michael R F Aitken; Barbara J Sahakian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Impulsivity and overeating: a closer look at the subscales of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale.

Authors:  Adrian Meule
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.