Literature DB >> 15669589

Presumed radically treated renal cell carcinoma--recurrence of the disease and prognostic factors for subsequent survival.

Christian Beisland1, Per Christian Medby, Hans Olav Beisland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To gain knowledge about when, where and how metastases after presumed radical treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are detected, and to use this information to establish a follow-up programme for radically treated RCC. Further aims were to establish survival rates, together with identifying prognostic factors influencing survival for different groups of patients after recurrence of the disease.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 305 pT1-4N0M0/pT1-4NxM0 (clinically N0) tumours treated with nephrectomy was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 89 patients (29.2%) developed metastases, with a median time to recurrence of 25.1 months. Within 5 years, 80% of the metastases had been detected. The lungs were the commonest metastatic site. A total of 34.8% of the recurrences were diagnosed as a result of routine follow-up. Median cancer-specific survival (CSS) after recurrence was 9.8 months. For patients with a disease-free interval (DFI) > or =24 months the median CSS was 35 months. In a univariate analysis, performance status, DFI > or =24 months, metastases in a single organ, primary tumour size < or =70 mm, primary tumour stage pT1-2 and age <65 years were all associated with better survival. In a multivariate analysis, performance status, DFI and number of organs affected were independent predictors of survival.
CONCLUSION: The information from this material is used to suggest a simple, but adequate, follow-up protocol. Easily accessible information can be used to identify groups with different prognoses regarding survival after recurrence of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15669589     DOI: 10.1080/00365590410028818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  7 in total

1.  A prospective risk-stratified follow-up programme for radically treated renal cell carcinoma patients: evaluation after eight years of clinical use.

Authors:  Christian Beisland; Gigja Guðbrandsdottir; Lars A R Reisæter; Leif Bostad; Karin M Hjelle
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Surgical resection of urological tumor metastases following medical treatment.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Stefan Wilop; Michael Pinkawa; Daniel Porres; David Pfister
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  [Resecting hematogenous metastases: reasons against].

Authors:  F C Roos; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: patient survival after surgical treatment.

Authors:  Andreas Fottner; Melinda Szalantzy; Lilly Wirthmann; Michael Stähler; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Volkmar Jansson; Hans Roland Dürr
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Skeletal Metastasis as Detected by 18F-FDG PET with Negative CT of the PET/CT: Frequency and Impact on Cancer Staging and/or Management.

Authors:  Fatma Ahmed; Razi Muzaffar; Hermina Fernandes; Yifan Tu; Batool Albalooshi; Medhat M Osman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Pulmonary and chest wall metastasectomy in urogenital tumors: a single center experience and review of literature.

Authors:  Seyd Hossein Fattahi Masoum; Behzad Feizzdeh Kerigh; Alireza Goreifi
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2014-05-03

7.  Patient Reported Weight Loss Predicts Recurrence Rate in Renal Cell Cancer Cases after Nephrectomy

Authors:  Priya Tiwari; Lalit Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar; Geetika Singh; Prabhat Malik; Amlesh Seth
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-04-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.