Literature DB >> 15669373

A comparison of seven traps used for collection of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti originating from a large tire repository in Harris County (Houston), Texas.

James A Dennett1, Nathan Y Vessey, Ray E Parsons.   

Abstract

Among 7 traps tested, significantly higher (P < 0.01) mean numbers of Aedes albopictus (269) and Aedes aegypti (55) females were collected within the Mosquito Magnet Liberty trap compared with the remaining traps. The second highest mean captures for both species were obtained from omnidirectional Fay-Prince (77 Ae. albopictus) and Dragonfly (13 Ae. aegypti) traps, which were not significantly different (P > 0.01) from an experimental moving-target trap that produced mean captures of 40 Ae. albopictus and 6 Ae. aegypti (alpha = 0.01). In terms of Ae. albopictus capture, no significant differences (P > 0.01) existed between Dragonfly, CDC without light (CDC -), and CDC with light (CDC +) captures, which were significantly different (P < 0.01) from Mosquito Deleto. No statistical significance existed between moving-target, omnidirectional, CDC +, CDC -, and Mosquito Deleto traps in terms of Ae. aegypti capture (P > 0.01), individual trap positions, or number of Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti females collected throughout the 21-day test (P > 0.05). Mosquito Magnet Liberty collected 7,208 Ae. albopictus, 1467 Ae. aegypti, and 13 other species representing 5 genera, which comprised the largest total (9662) and percentage (62.5%) of mosquitoes collected by all traps combined. Omnidirectional and moving-target traps captured 1941 and 1050 Ae. albopictus, 138 and 220 Ae. aegypti, and 2171 (14.0%) and 1397 (9.0%) of the total mosquitoes captured by all traps, with 8 and 10 species representing 5 genera, respectively, included in these collections. The Dragonfly captured 476 Ae. albopictus, 376 Ae. aegypti, and 1008 total specimens (6.5%) representing 8 species and 4 genera in these collections. CDC + and CDC - traps collected nearly identical numbers of Ae. albopictus (431, 450) and Ae. aegypti (71, 71) with 537 (3.4%) and 551 (3.5%) total specimens, respectively. Eight species representing 5 genera were captured from CDC +, whereas CDC - captured 6 species representing 4 genera. Mosquito Deleto captured 118 mosquitoes, including 19 Ae. albopictus and 62 Ae. aegypti females (0.7%), with 6 species representing 4 genera. Battery-powered traps with contrasting color schemes and movement worked considerably better than stationary CDC miniatures without color or movement. Omnidirectional Fay-Prince and moving-target traps without octenol captured Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti females as frequently as some commercial traps. Additionally, costs incurred per mosquito trapped, future trap design, and important consumer-centered issues are briefly discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15669373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc        ISSN: 8756-971X            Impact factor:   0.917


  11 in total

1.  Infrared light sensors permit rapid recording of wingbeat frequency and bioacoustic species identification of mosquitoes.

Authors:  Dongmin Kim; Terry J DeBriere; Satish Cherukumalli; Gregory S White; Nathan D Burkett-Cadena
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Nationwide inventory of mosquito biodiversity (Diptera: Culicidae) in Belgium, Europe.

Authors:  V Versteirt; S Boyer; D Damiens; E M De Clercq; W Dekoninck; E Ducheyne; P Grootaert; C Garros; T Hance; G Hendrickx; M Coosemans; W Van Bortel
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.750

3.  Modelling the potential spatial distribution of mosquito species using three different techniques.

Authors:  Daniela Cianci; Nienke Hartemink; Adolfo Ibáñez-Justicia
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.918

4.  Development of the BG-Malaria trap as an alternative to human-landing catches for the capture of Anopheles darlingi.

Authors:  Renata Antonaci Gama; Ivoneide Maria da Silva; Martin Geier; Alvaro Eduardo Eiras
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.743

5.  Field evaluation of four widely used mosquito traps in Central Europe.

Authors:  Renke Lühken; Wolf Peter Pfitzner; Jessica Börstler; Rolf Garms; Katrin Huber; Nino Schork; Sonja Steinke; Ellen Kiel; Norbert Becker; Egbert Tannich; Andreas Krüger
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 6.  Is there an efficient trap or collection method for sampling Anopheles darlingi and other malaria vectors that can describe the essential parameters affecting transmission dynamics as effectively as human landing catches? - A Review.

Authors:  José Bento Pereira Lima; Maria Goreti Rosa-Freitas; Cynara Melo Rodovalho; Fátima Santos; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.743

7.  Detection of Exotic Mosquito Species (Diptera: Culicidae) at International Airports in Europe.

Authors:  Adolfo Ibáñez-Justicia; Nathalie Smitz; Wietse den Hartog; Bart van de Vossenberg; Katrien De Wolf; Isra Deblauwe; Wim Van Bortel; Frans Jacobs; Alexander G C Vaux; Jolyon M Medlock; Arjan Stroo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  A comparative assessment of adult mosquito trapping methods to estimate spatial patterns of abundance and community composition in southern Africa.

Authors:  Erin E Gorsich; Brianna R Beechler; Peter M van Bodegom; Danny Govender; Milehna M Guarido; Marietjie Venter; Maarten Schrama
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Comparison of Fan-Traps and Gravitraps for Aedes Mosquito Surveillance in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chao-Ying Pan; Lie Cheng; Wei-Liang Liu; Matthew P Su; Hui-Pin Ho; Che-Hun Liao; Jui-Hun Chang; Yu-Chieh Yang; Cheng-Chun Hsu; Joh-Jong Huang; Chun-Hong Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-17

10.  Microbiome Interaction Networks and Community Structure From Laboratory-Reared and Field-Collected Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus Mosquito Vectors.

Authors:  Shivanand Hegde; Kamil Khanipov; Levent Albayrak; George Golovko; Maria Pimenova; Miguel A Saldaña; Mark M Rojas; Emily A Hornett; Greg C Motl; Chris L Fredregill; James A Dennett; Mustapha Debboun; Yuriy Fofanov; Grant L Hughes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.