Literature DB >> 15669298

Initial public perceptions of deep geological and oceanic disposal of carbon dioxide.

Claire R Palmgren1, M Granger Morgan, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, David W Keith.   

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to gauge likely public perceptions of proposals to avoid releasing carbon dioxide from power plants to the atmosphere by injecting it into deep geological formations or the deep ocean. Following a modified version of the mental model interview method, Study 1 involved face-to-face interviews with 18 nontechnical respondents. Respondents shared their beliefs after receiving basic information about the technologies and again after getting specific details. Many interviewees wanted to frame the issue in the broader context of alternative strategies for carbon management, but public understanding of mitigation strategies is limited. The second study, administered to a sample of 126 individuals, involved a closed-form survey that measured the prevalence of general beliefs revealed in study 1 and also assessed the respondent's views of these technologies. Study results suggest that the public may develop misgivings about deep injection of carbon dioxide because it can be seen as temporizing and perhaps creating future problems. Ocean injection was seen as more problematic than geological injection. An approach to public communication and regulation that is open and respectful of public concerns is likely to be a prerequisite to the successful adoption of this technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15669298     DOI: 10.1021/es040400c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Assessing what to address in science communication.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ann Bostrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reflections on an interdisciplinary collaboration to inform public understanding of climate change, mitigation, and impacts.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Modelling socio-environmental sensitivities: how public responses to low carbon energy technologies could shape the UK energy system.

Authors:  Brighid Moran Jay; David Howard; Nick Hughes; Jeanette Whitaker; Gabrial Anandarajah
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-27

Review 4.  Public perception of carbon capture and storage: A state-of-the-art overview.

Authors:  Pavel Tcvetkov; Alexey Cherepovitsyn; Sergey Fedoseev
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-12-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.