Literature DB >> 15668813

Diagnostic evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging with turbo inversion recovery sequence in head and neck tumors.

Maliha Sadick1, Haneen Sadick, Karl Hörmann, C Düber, Steffen J Diehl.   

Abstract

The clinical outcome of patients with head and neck cancer depends on many factors such as tumor size, metastatic involvement and angioarchitecture of the tumor. The correct staging of tumor extension, presence of cervical lymph node metastases and evaluation of vascular infiltration are essential diagnostic steps before treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of head and neck tumors with special attention to tumor size and tumor spread according to the current TNM classification. TIRM sequence with short T1 relaxation and long TE (echo time) improves imaging contrast because of the increased T1-weighting and the inherent fat suppression. In a prospective clinical study, 32 patients underwent preoperative MRI. Diagnosis was confirmed histologically in all cases. Scanning was performed on a 1.0-T unit applying TIRM as well as T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences. In all sequences, tumor size was overestimated due to reactive inflammatory changes surrounding the tumor tissue. The least overestimation was documented on TIRM and post-contrast T1 TSE. The highest values of relative tumor signal intensities were obtained in TIRM (3.5+/-0.9) and T2 TSE (3.5+/-0.8) followed by post-contrast T1 TSE (1.6+/-0.7) and pre-contrast T1 TSE (1.2+/-0.3). Due to the inherent fat suppression, tumor delineation was most obvious in TIRM. In patients with suspected cancer of the head and neck, TIRM should be considered as a standard and a diagnostically relevant sequence in the MRI staging protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15668813     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-004-0878-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  [The magnetic resonance tomographic differential diagnosis between reactively enlarged lymph nodes and cervical lymph node metastases].

Authors:  H J Steinkamp; T Heim; P Schubeus; W Schörner; R Felix
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1992-10

Review 2.  Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  P M Som
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Atypical squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx: radiologic features and pathologic correlation.

Authors:  M Becker; G Moulin; A M Kurt; P Zbären; P Dulgerov; F Marchal; P Zanaret; W Lehmann; D A Rüfenacht; F Terrier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  [The value of magnetic resonance tomography and computed tomography in the tumor staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas].

Authors:  H J Steinkamp; T Heim; J Mäurer; F Mathe; R Felix
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1993-05

5.  Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Misa Sumi; Noriyuki Sakihama; Tadateru Sumi; Minoru Morikawa; Masataka Uetani; Hiroyuki Kabasawa; Koichiro Shigeno; Kuniaki Hayashi; Haruo Takahashi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Diagnostic strategies in cervical carcinoma of an unknown primary (CUP).

Authors:  Inge Haas; Thomas K Hoffmann; Rainer Engers; Uwe Ganzer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.

Authors:  M R Ross; D F Schomer; P Chappell; D R Enzmann
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  CT determination of lymphocytic infiltration around head and neck squamous cell carcinomas may be a predictor of lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Marc Keberle; Philipp Ströbel; Alexander Marx; Dietbert Hahn; Florian Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Assessment of metastatic cervical adenopathy using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Nancy J Fischbein; Susan M Noworolski; Roland G Henry; Michael J Kaplan; William P Dillon; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Detection and characterization of metastatic cervical adenopathy by MR imaging: comparison of different MR techniques.

Authors:  M W van den Brekel; J A Castelijns; H V Stel; J Valk; G A Croll; R P Golding; W J Luth; C J Meyer; G B Snow
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.