Literature DB >> 15668618

The legal status of patient-delivered partner therapy for sexually transmitted infections in the United States: a national survey of state medical and pharmacy boards.

Matthew R Golden1, Uzoeshi Anukam, Donald H Williams, H Hunter Handsfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to define the legal status of patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) in the United States. STUDY: A survey of directors of state boards of pharmacy and medicine in the 50 United States and the District of Columbia was performed.
RESULTS: Completed surveys were returned by 37 (72%) pharmacy boards and 37 (72%) medical boards representing 47 states. PDPT was clearly defined as legal in four states. PDPT was regarded as illegal by 16 (43%) medical boards and 19 (51%) pharmacy boards and as of uncertain legality by 16 (43%) medical boards and 14 (38%) pharmacy boards. Most boards (88%) that regarded PDPT as illegal or of uncertain legality indicated that the issue had never been addressed.
CONCLUSIONS: The legal status of PDPT is uncertain in much of the U.S., and the practice is often considered illegal. New laws or legal rulings will be needed if PDPT is to be widely promoted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15668618     DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000152823.10388.99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  8 in total

1.  Sexually transmitted infections in Canada: A sticky situation.

Authors:  David N Fisman; Kevin B Laupland
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  A historical note on the association between the legal status of expedited partner therapy and physician practice.

Authors:  Ryan Cramer; Matthew Hogben; H Hunter Handsfield
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Reticence to prescribe: utilization of expedited partner therapy among obstetrics providers in Arizona.

Authors:  M M Taylor; M G Collier; M M Winscott; T Mickey; B England
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 1.359

Review 4.  Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nazmul Alam; Eric Chamot; Sten H Vermund; Kim Streatfield; Sibylle Kristensen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention Policies in the United States: Evidence and Opportunities.

Authors:  Jami S Leichliter; Naomi Seiler; Dan Wohlfeiler
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Use of Expedited Partner Therapy for Sexually Transmitted Diseases in College and University Health Centers in the United States, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Ryan Cramer; Nina Martinez; Craig Roberts; Melissa A Habel; E Victor Leino; Jami S Leichliter
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Expedited partner therapy for sexually transmitted diseases: assessing the legal environment.

Authors:  James G Hodge; Amy Pulver; Matthew Hogben; Dhrubajyoti Bhattacharya; Erin Fuse Brown
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Public health policies and management strategies for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  Kelly Shaw; David Coleman; Maree O'Sullivan; Nicola Stephens
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-05-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.