Literature DB >> 15668576

Surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures with associated femoral neck fractures using a sliding hip screw.

Richard F Kyle1, Thomas J Ellis, David C Templeman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report the results of surgical treatment of a subset of intertrochanteric fractures with posteromedial comminution and extension of the fracture line into the femoral neck using a sliding hip screw.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Level I county trauma center. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine fractures (8%) with this pattern were identified from 381 intertrochanteric hip fractures treated at a single institution over a 10-year period. Nine patients were excluded (2 died, 7 had incomplete radiographic follow-up), leaving 20 patients for assessment. INTERVENTION: All fractures were treated with a sliding hip screw. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiographs at a mean follow-up of 17 months were recorded as demonstrating: 1) fixation failure; 2) fracture union; or 3) fracture nonunion. The tip-apex distance, amount of lag screw collapse, screw position in the femoral head, and adequacy of reduction were determined.
RESULTS: Treatment failed according to these radiographic measures in 5 of 20 (25%) fractures. Failures included fracture nonunion (1 case), lag screw cutout (2 cases), and combined nonunion/lag screw cutout (2 cases). All 5 failures had complete collapse of the lag screw, whereas 4 of the 15 successfully treated fractures had complete collapse. The amount of collapse was significantly greater for the treatment failures (mean, 38 mm) than in the successfully treated hips (mean, 20 mm). There was no significant association between treatment success or failure and tip-apex distance, lag screw position, and adequacy of reduction.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that intertrochanteric hip fractures with associated femoral neck fractures should not be managed with a standard sliding hip screw.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15668576     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200501000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is rotation the mode of failure in pertrochanteric fractures fixed with nails? Theoretical approach and illustrative cases.

Authors:  C Kokoroghiannis; D Vasilakos; K Zisis; G Dimitriou; E Pappa; D Evangelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-20

2.  Clinical outcomes of dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures: comparison with additional anti-rotation screw use.

Authors:  Chul-Ho Kim; Jae Suk Chang; Ji Wan Kim
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-03-07

3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications in conversion arthroplasty methods for failed intertrochanteric fracture fixation.

Authors:  Daniel B Dix; Ibukunoluwa B Araoye; Jackson R Staggers; Chee P Lin; Ashish B Shah; Amit Kumar Agarwal; Sameer M Naranje
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-02-21

4.  Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fractures Involving Both the Subcapital Area and the Trochanteric or Subtrochanteric Area.

Authors:  Takayuki Tani; Hiroaki Kijima; Natsuo Konishi; Hitoshi Kubota; Shin Yamada; Hiroshi Tazawa; Norio Suzuki; Keiji Kamo; Yoshihiko Okudera; Masashi Fujii; Ken Sasaki; Tetsuya Kawano; Yosuke Iwamoto; Itsuki Nagahata; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-04-04

5.  A review of tip apex distance in dynamic hip screw fixation of osteoporotic hip fractures.

Authors:  Imran Haruna Abdulkareem
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2012-10

6.  Critical factors in cut-out complication after Gamma Nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Alicja J Bojan; Claudia Beimel; Gilbert Taglang; David Collin; Carl Ekholm; Anders Jönsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.