Literature DB >> 15668557

Kinematic alterations in the ipsilateral shoulder of patients with hemiplegia due to stroke.

Carel G M Meskers1, Peter A Koppe, Manin H Konijnenbelt, Dirkjan H E J Veeger, Thomas W J Janssen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the assumption that shoulder kinematic patterns of the ipsilateral, nonparetic shoulder in hemiplegia are similar to kinematics recorded in a healthy population.
DESIGN: Case control study of a convenience sample of ten patients with hemiplegia due to stroke in the subacute phase compared with a control group of similar age. Three-dimensional positions of the scapula and humerus were measured and expressed in Euler angles as a function of active arm elevation in the frontal and sagittal plane and during passive humeral internal/external rotation at an elevation angle of 90 degrees in the frontal and sagittal plane.
RESULTS: Compared with controls, in the ipsilateral shoulder of patients, we found both a statistically significant diminished scapular protraction during elevation in the sagittal plane (35 +/- 5 vs. 51 +/- 8 degrees at 110 degrees of humeral elevation) and humeral external rotation during arm elevation in the frontal plane (51 +/- 7 vs. 69 +/- 14 degrees at 110 degrees of humeral elevation). Maximal passive humeral external rotation was found to be impaired in the frontal (64 +/- 13 vs. 98 +/- 14 degrees) and sagittal planes (65 +/- 11 vs. 94 +/- 12 degrees). In addition, there was significantly diminished anterior spinal tilt during humeral internal rotation (-5 +/- 10 vs. -20 +/- 9 degrees) and diminished posterior spinal tilt during external rotation in the frontal plane (-14 +/- 8 vs. -3 +/- 6 degrees). Maximal thoracohumeral elevation in patients was significantly impaired (126 +/- 12 vs. 138 +/- 8 degrees).
CONCLUSION: Clear kinematic changes in the ipsilateral shoulder in patients with hemiplegia were found, indicating underlying alterations in muscle contraction patterns. The cause remains speculative. These results suggest that the ipsilateral shoulder should not be considered to function normally beforehand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15668557     DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000150792.26793.e9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  13 in total

1.  Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors.

Authors:  Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Andrea Giovanardi; Laura Rocchi; Angelo Davalli; Rinaldo Sacchetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Incremental limb hypometria.

Authors:  T Mizuno; G P Crucian; G R Finney; Y Jeong; V Drago; K M Heilman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Scapular and humeral movement patterns of people with stroke during range-of-motion exercises.

Authors:  Dustin D Hardwick; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Stroke survivors talk while doing: development of a therapeutic framework for continued rehabilitation of hand function post stroke.

Authors:  Rosanna C Sabini; Marcel P J M Dijkers; Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 1.950

5.  Influence of the side of brain damage on postural upper-limb control including the scapula in stroke patients.

Authors:  Johanna V G Robertson; Nicolas Roche; Agnès Roby-Brami
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Scapula and humeral movement patterns and their relationship with pain: A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Dustin D Hardwick; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Int J Ther Rehabil       Date:  2011-04-06

7.  Posttraumatic midshaft clavicular shortening does not result in relevant functional outcome changes.

Authors:  Sylvia A Stegeman; Pieter Bas de Witte; Sjoerd Boonstra; Jurriaan H de Groot; Jochem Nagels; Pieta Krijnen; Inger B Schipper
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  The Arm Movement Detection (AMD) test: a fast robotic test of proprioceptive acuity in the arm.

Authors:  Leigh Ann Mrotek; Maria Bengtson; Tina Stoeckmann; Lior Botzer; Claude P Ghez; John McGuire; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Dynamic scapular movement analysis: is it feasible and reliable in stroke patients during arm elevation?

Authors:  Liesbet De Baets; Sara Van Deun; Kaat Desloovere; Ellen Jaspers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A robotic test of proprioception within the hemiparetic arm post-stroke.

Authors:  Lucia Simo; Lior Botzer; Claude Ghez; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.