Literature DB >> 15668475

Insulin-like growth factor-I, IGF binding protein-3, and breast cancer in young women: a comparison of risk estimates using different peptide assays.

Sabina Rinaldi1, Rudolf Kaaks, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Alan A Arslan, Roy E Shore, Karen L Koenig, Laure Dossus, Elio Riboli, Pär Stattin, Annekatrin Lukanova, Paolo Toniolo.   

Abstract

Circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and its major binding protein IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) have been associated with increased risk of premenopausal breast cancer, although risk estimates varied broadly. An extension of a case-control study (138 cases, 259 matched controls) on IGF-I and breast cancer in premenopausal women nested in the New York University Women's Health Study cohort offered the opportunity to address the hypothesis that such variability may have been the result of variations in the ability of different IGFBP-3 assays to specifically measure intact/functional forms of the protein. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 had originally been measured using in-house RIAs. These measurements were repeated using commercially available ELISAs [Diagnostic System Laboratories (DSL), Webster, Texas], and a third ELISA with greater specificity for active forms for IGFBP-3. Pearson's correlations between IGF-I concentrations in the original study and DSL ELISA were very high [r = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94]. Correlations with DSL ELISA were much lower for IGFBP-3 (r = 0.58; 0.49-0.66) and even lower still with the assay for functional IGFBP-3 (r = 0.33; 0.20-0.44). IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measurements by the DSL ELISA methods showed statistically significant relationships with risk. The odds ratios (OR) for top versus bottom quartiles were 1.93 (1.00-3.72; P = 0.02) and 2.03 (1.09-3.76; P = 0.02), respectively, in agreement with the original observations. In contrast, measurements of functional IGFBP-3 tended to be unrelated to risk [ORs for the top versus bottom quartile, 0.97 (0.44-2.11)]. The association with IGF-I became substantially weaker and lost statistical significance after adjustment for IGFBP-3 using DSL ELISA, but became considerably stronger when adjusting for the functional IGFBP-3 measurements [OR = 2.43 (1.21-4.90); P = 0.005], or when considering the molar ratio of IGF-I to IGFBP-3 [OR = 2.37 (1.13-5.00); P = 0.02]. These results are consistent with an association of breast cancer risk in young women with elevated IGF-I and IGFBP-3, and show that for IGFBP-3, the strength of such an association could vary substantially depending on the assay used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15668475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  14 in total

1.  Plasma insulin-like growth factor 1 is positively associated with low-grade prostate cancer in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study 1993-2004.

Authors:  Katharina Nimptsch; Elizabeth A Platz; Michael N Pollak; Stacey A Kenfield; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett; Edward Giovannucci
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Dose-dependent effect of aerobic exercise on inflammatory biomarkers in a randomized controlled trial of women at high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy S Haley; Elizabeth A Hibler; Shouhao Zhou; Kathryn H Schmitz; Kathleen M Sturgeon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Circulating insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 levels and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial (PLCO) cohort.

Authors:  Catherine Schairer; Catherine A McCarty; Claudine Isaacs; Laura Y Sue; Michael N Pollak; Christine D Berg; Regina G Ziegler
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.869

4.  Association between endogenous sex steroid hormones and insulin-like growth factor proteins in US men.

Authors:  Stefania I Papatheodorou; Sabine Rohrmann; David S Lopez; Gary Bradwin; Corinne E Joshu; Norma Kanarek; William G Nelson; Nader Rifai; Elizabeth A Platz; Konstantinos K Tsilidis
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Genetic variants, prediagnostic circulating levels of insulin-like growth factors, insulin, and glucose and the risk of colorectal cancer: the Multiethnic Cohort study.

Authors:  Nicholas J Ollberding; Iona Cheng; Lynne R Wilkens; Brian E Henderson; Michael N Pollak; Laurence N Kolonel; Loïc Le Marchand
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  The proliferating role of insulin and insulin-like growth factors in cancer.

Authors:  Emily Jane Gallagher; Derek LeRoith
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 7.  Circulating insulin-like growth factor peptides and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mari-Anne Rowlands; David Gunnell; Ross Harris; Lars J Vatten; Jeff M P Holly; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Unraveling insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 actions in human disease.

Authors:  Sherryline Jogie-Brahim; David Feldman; Youngman Oh
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 19.871

9.  Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Receptor (IGF-IR) Ligands and BMI in Squamous Intra-Epithelial Lesion (SIL) of Cervix.

Authors:  Praveen Sablania; Swaraj Batra; Alpana Saxena
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

10.  Insulin-like growth factors, their binding proteins, and prostate cancer risk: analysis of individual patient data from 12 prospective studies.

Authors:  Andrew W Roddam; Naomi E Allen; Paul Appleby; Timothy J Key; Luigi Ferrucci; H Ballentine Carter; E Jeffrey Metter; Chu Chen; Noel S Weiss; Annette Fitzpatrick; Ann W Hsing; James V Lacey; Kathy Helzlsouer; Sabina Rinaldi; Elio Riboli; Rudolf Kaaks; Joop A M J L Janssen; Mark F Wildhagen; Fritz H Schröder; Elizabeth A Platz; Michael Pollak; Edward Giovannucci; Catherine Schaefer; Charles P Quesenberry; Joseph H Vogelman; Gianluca Severi; Dallas R English; Graham G Giles; Pär Stattin; Göran Hallmans; Mattias Johansson; June M Chan; Peter Gann; Steven E Oliver; Jeff M Holly; Jenny Donovan; François Meyer; Isabelle Bairati; Pilar Galan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.