BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of data relating UK general practice workload to personal and social markers of individual patients. AIM: To test whether there is a significant association between general practice patient contact rates and the council tax valuation band of their residential address. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional analyses using data recorded, over 1 year, for over 3300 general practice patients. SETTING: One medium-sized group practice in an industrialised English market town. METHOD: Face-to-face contacts between the patients and the doctors and nurses in the practice were compared by patient age, sex, registration period, distance from surgery, Underprivileged Area 8 (UPA8) score, and council tax valuation band. RESULTS: Patient sex, age, recent registration, distance from surgery, and council tax valuation band were each significantly associated with face-to-face contact rate in univariate analyses. UPA8 score was not significantly associated with contact rates. On multivariate testing, sex, age, recent registration, and council tax valuation band remained significantly associated with contact rates. The last is a new finding. CONCLUSION: Council tax valuation bands predict contact rate in general practice; the lower the band, the higher the contact rate. Council tax valuation band could be a useful marker of workload that is linked to socioeconomic status. This is a pilot study and multipractice research is advocated.
BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of data relating UK general practice workload to personal and social markers of individual patients. AIM: To test whether there is a significant association between general practice patient contact rates and the council tax valuation band of their residential address. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional analyses using data recorded, over 1 year, for over 3300 general practice patients. SETTING: One medium-sized group practice in an industrialised English market town. METHOD: Face-to-face contacts between the patients and the doctors and nurses in the practice were compared by patient age, sex, registration period, distance from surgery, Underprivileged Area 8 (UPA8) score, and council tax valuation band. RESULTS:Patient sex, age, recent registration, distance from surgery, and council tax valuation band were each significantly associated with face-to-face contact rate in univariate analyses. UPA8 score was not significantly associated with contact rates. On multivariate testing, sex, age, recent registration, and council tax valuation band remained significantly associated with contact rates. The last is a new finding. CONCLUSION: Council tax valuation bands predict contact rate in general practice; the lower the band, the higher the contact rate. Council tax valuation band could be a useful marker of workload that is linked to socioeconomic status. This is a pilot study and multipractice research is advocated.
Authors: Norman Beale; Gill Kane; Mark Gwynne; Carole Peart; Gordon Taylor; David Herrick; Andy Boyd Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2006-01-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: David L Fone; Frank Dunstan; Stephen Christie; Andrew Jones; Jonathan West; Margaret Webber; Nathan Lester; John Watkins Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 3.295