Literature DB >> 15667684

Staff attitudes to a daily otolaryngology ward round.

M-L Montague1, M S W Lee, S S M Hussain.   

Abstract

This survey investigates the attitudes of medical and nursing staff towards the daily otolaryngology ward rounds in a teaching hospital. Initial, open-ended questionnaires generated themes from which a structured questionnaire was constructed. Respondents indicated on a Likert scale the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with statements concerning their attitudes towards the ward round. Thirty-five members of staff were surveyed. The overall response rate was 74.3 per cent (n = 26). The majority of staff agreed that the ward round was a constructive use of their time and served to promote team spirit. It allowed for adequate communication between medical and nursing staff but there was uncertainty about the provision of adequate patient communication. The nursing staff agreed that the ward round provided a valuable learning experience. There was uncertainty about this among the medical staff. There was agreement in both groups that patients find the ward round to be reassuring. A significant majority of staff expressed concerns over maintenance of patient confidentiality. These findings could be used to inform changes in the departmental ward round structure. Specific attention should be directed to discussing sensitive issues in a more private setting and maximizing educational opportunities for junior medical staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15667684     DOI: 10.1258/0022215042790682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the literature on multidisciplinary rounds to design information technology.

Authors:  Ayse P Gurses; Yan Xiao
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Ward stories: lessons learned from patient perception of the ward round.

Authors:  Gemma Reddin; Niall F Davis; Kenneth Mc Donald
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  ICU Rounds: "What We've Got Here Is Failure to Communicate".

Authors:  Noa Segall; Elliott Bennett-Guerrero
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  The Effects of Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds on Patient Centeredness, Quality of Care, and Team Collaboration: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tine Heip; Ann Van Hecke; Simon Malfait; Wim Van Biesen; Kristof Eeckloo
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.844

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.