Literature DB >> 15667130

Determining the validity of a QSAR model--a classification approach.

Rajarshi Guha1, Peter C Jurs.   

Abstract

The determination of the validity of a QSAR model when applied to new compounds is an important concern in the field of QSAR and QSPR modeling. Various scoring techniques can be applied to specific types of models. We present a technique with which we can state whether a new compound will be well predicted by a previously built QSAR model. In this study we focus on linear regression models only, though the technique is general and could also be applied to other types of quantitative models. Our technique is based on a classification method that divides regression residuals from a previously generated model into a good class and bad class and then builds a classifier based on this division. The trained classifier is then used to determine the class of the residual for a new compound. We investigated the performance of a variety of classifiers, both linear and nonlinear. The technique was tested on two data sets from the literature and a hand built data set. The data sets selected covered both physical and biological properties and also presented the methodology with quantitative regression models of varying quality. The results indicate that this technique can determine whether a new compound will be well or poorly predicted with weighted success rates ranging from 73% to 94% for the best classifier.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15667130     DOI: 10.1021/ci0497511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  7 in total

Review 1.  A cheminformatic toolkit for mining biomedical knowledge.

Authors:  Gus R Rosania; Gordon Crippen; Peter Woolf; David States; Kerby Shedden
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection--what can we learn from earlier mistakes?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Patrick Markt; Simona Distinto; Gerhard Wolber; Thierry Langer
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Toward a general predictive QSAR model for gamma-secretase inhibitors.

Authors:  Subhash Ajmani; Sridhara Janardhan; Vellarkad N Viswanadhan
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.943

4.  Docking and 3D-QSAR studies of acetohydroxy acid synthase inhibitor sulfonylurea derivatives.

Authors:  Kunal Roy; Somnath Paul
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Docking and 3D QSAR studies of protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor 3H-pyrazolo[3,4-d][1,2,3]triazin-4-one derivatives.

Authors:  Kunal Roy; Somnath Paul
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  DPRESS: Localizing estimates of predictive uncertainty.

Authors:  Robert D Clark
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.514

7.  Hyaluronidase Inhibitory Activity of Pentacylic Triterpenoids from Prismatomeris tetrandra (Roxb.) K. Schum: Isolation, Synthesis and QSAR Study.

Authors:  Nor Hayati Abdullah; Noel Francis Thomas; Yasodha Sivasothy; Vannajan Sanghiran Lee; Sook Yee Liew; Ibrahim Ali Noorbatcha; Khalijah Awang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.