Literature DB >> 15666763

Fipronil resistance in the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): inheritance and number of genes involved.

Ali H Sayyed1, Denis J Wright.   

Abstract

Bioassays (at generation 1, G1) using fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, and Bacillus thuringiensis toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca with a newly collected field population of Plutella xylostella (L.) from farmers fields in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia, indicated a resistance ratio of approximately 400-, 1,170-, 330-, 2,840-, and 1,410-fold, respectively, compared with a laboratory-susceptible population of P. xylostella (ROTH). At G3, the field-derived population was divided into two subpopulations, one was selected (G3 to G7) with fipronil (fip-SEL), whereas the second was left unselected (UNSEL). Bioassays at G8 found that selection with fipronil gave a resistance ratio of approximately 490 compared with UNSEL and approximately 770 compared with ROTH. The resistance ratio for fipronil, spinosad, indoxacarb, Cry1Ac, and Cry1Ca in the UNSEL population declined significantly by G8. Logit regression analysis of F1 reciprocal crosses between fip-SEL (at G8) and UNSEL indicated that resistance to fipronil in the fip-SEL population was inherited as an autosomal, incompletely recessive (D(LC) = 0.37) trait. At the highest dose of fipronil tested, resistance was completely recessive, whereas at the lowest dose it was incompletely recessive. A direct test of monogenic inheritance based on a backcross of F1 progeny with fip-SEL suggested that resistance to fipronil was controlled by a single locus. The fip-SEL population at G8 showed little change in its response to spinosad and indoxacarb compared with G1, whereas its susceptibility to Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca increased markedly over the selection period. This suggests that there may be some low level of cross-resistance between fipronil, spinosad, and indoxacarb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15666763     DOI: 10.1093/jee/97.6.2043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  4 in total

1.  Cross-resistance, genetics, and realized heritability of resistance to fipronil in the house fly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae): a potential vector for disease transmission.

Authors:  Naeem Abbas; Hafiz Azhar Ali Khan; Sarfraz Ali Shad
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Synergistic and antagonistic effects of piperonyl butoxide in fipronil-susceptible and resistant rice stem borrers, Chilo suppressalis.

Authors:  Qingchun Huang; Yunfei Deng; Taisong Zhan; Yuan He
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

3.  Does phenoloxidase contributed to the resistance? Selection with butane-fipronil enhanced its activities from diamondback moths.

Authors:  Shouzhu Liu; Hongtao Niu; Ting Xiao; Chaobin Xue; Zhongde Liu; Wanchun Luo
Journal:  Open Biochem J       Date:  2009-01-26

Review 4.  Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates.

Authors:  L W Pisa; V Amaral-Rogers; L P Belzunces; J M Bonmatin; C A Downs; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C Krupke; M Liess; M McField; C A Morrissey; D A Noome; J Settele; N Simon-Delso; J D Stark; J P Van der Sluijs; H Van Dyck; M Wiemers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.